2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002840010257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Dietary Ferric Iron and Iron Deprivation on the Bacterial Composition of the Mouse Intestine

Abstract: The influence of dietary ferric iron on the intestinal microbiota of mice was investigated with a view to promoting benign lactic acid bacteria (which have minimal iron requirements) in order to enhance colonization-resistance potential. Three groups of eight mice received a diet differing only in iron content, for a period of 12 weeks. Dietary iron deprivation resulted in overall increased small intestinal bacterial populations, including lactic acid bacteria, but these differences were generally not signific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
55
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar diets and feeding periods have been used previously to reduce iron status in rodents (16,17). Males and females were analyzed together, because there was no interaction between the primary variables and sex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar diets and feeding periods have been used previously to reduce iron status in rodents (16,17). Males and females were analyzed together, because there was no interaction between the primary variables and sex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adult rodents, iron deprivation increased fecal total anaerobes, Enterococcus spp. as well as lactobacilli (32). ID in rats increased Enterobacteriaceae and Lactobacillus/Leuconostoc/Pediococcus spp.…”
Section: Animal and In Vitro Studiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, since it appears that different E. coli strains have different nutritional programs for growth in the intestine (13,17), it seems likely that nonisogenic strains fail to display colonization resistance for nutritional reasons. That is, when the precolonized E. coli strain and the E. coli strain fed at day 10 are strains isolated from different humans, and the strain fed at day 10 grows from low to higher numbers, without eliminating the precolonized strain, we hypothesize that it does so either by using one or more nutrients not being used by the precolonized strain or by outcompeting it for one or more nutrients; however, we fully recognize that E. coli colonization may be impacted by several other factors, including interaction with the indigenous microbiota (21,50), innate immunity (12), and competition for iron (59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%