2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf03393015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Deprivation, Presession Exposure, and Preferences on Teaching Manding to Children with Autism

Abstract: The effects of at least 23-hr deprivation, 5-min presession exposure, and individual preference on the acquisition of mands were investigated in these studies. Two boys who were 2.5 years old and diagnosed with autism participated in the studies. Preference assessments were conducted to identify preference levels of various toys. Toys of various preferences were then assigned to either a 23-hr deprivation or 5-min presession exposure condition for mand training. Both deprivation and preference level affected a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ensuring the presence of a motivating EO is generally considered to be essential for effectively training individuals with ASD to ask questions (Hartman & Klatt, 2005;Sundberg & Michael, 2001;Sundberg & Partington, 1998). Across the reviewed studies, several procedures were used to ensure the participants were motivated to ask questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensuring the presence of a motivating EO is generally considered to be essential for effectively training individuals with ASD to ask questions (Hartman & Klatt, 2005;Sundberg & Michael, 2001;Sundberg & Partington, 1998). Across the reviewed studies, several procedures were used to ensure the participants were motivated to ask questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these studies have done so indirectly prior to the study. For example, many researchers have conducted paired-stimulus (Fisher et al, 1992), free operant (Roane, Vollmer, Ringdahl, & Marcus, 1998), or multiple stimulus without replacement (DeLeon & Iwata, 1996) preference assessments to identify preferred stimuli to teach the participants to mand (Betz, Higbee, & Pollard, 2010;Bock et al, 2005;Bourret, Vollmer, & Rapp, 2004;Carr & Kologinsky, 1983;Davis, Kahng, & Coryat, 2012;Endicott & Higbee, 2007;Ganz, Simpson, & Corbin-Newsome, 2008;Gutierrez et al, 2007;Hartman & Klatt, 2005;Kodak & Clements, 2009;Kodak, Paden, & Dickes, 2012;Lechago et al, 2010;O'Reilly et al, 2012;Sidener et al, 2010;Tincani, 2004). Other researchers selected suspected reinforcers to teach individuals to mand by observing the individuals' reactions to those items or by measuring the amount of time the participants spent engaging with those items (Kelley et al, 2007;Lechago et al, 2010;Sweeney-Kerwin et al, 2007).…”
Section: Review Of Effective Mand Training Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of doing this has been by withholding reinforcers for a specified period of time prior to conducting mand training (Davis et al, 2012;Nuzzolo-Gomez & Greer, 2004;Kelley et al, 2007;O'Reilly et al, 2012). For example, Hartman and Klatt (2005) required that participants did not have access to reinforcers targeted for mand training for 23 hours prior to each training session. Similarly, researchers have sustained motivation by limiting the number of consecutive teaching trials for a particular reinforcer to avoid satiation (Charlop, Schreibman, & Thibodeau, 1985;Kelley, et al, 2007;Tincani, 2004;.…”
Section: Review Of Effective Mand Training Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mand training is effective in establishing the use of mands (Duker, Dortmans, & Lodder, 1993;Hartman & Klatt, 2005;Yamamoto & Mochizuki, 1988), decreasing various maladaptive behaviors Shafer, 1994), and increasing the effectiveness of language training for other verbal operants such as tact (Arntzen & Almas, 2002;Carroll & Hesse, 1987;Nuzzolo-Gomez & Greer, 2004). In addition, many studies have focused on establishing tacts in children with ASD (Naoi, Yokoyama, & Yamamoto, 2007;Partington, Sundberg, Newhouse, & Spengler, 1994;Sundberg, Endicott, & Eigenheer, 2000).…”
Section: Evidence Basementioning
confidence: 99%