2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of DEM resolution and neighborhood size on digital soil survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
66
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
66
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The adjustment of a DEM to a scale enables the development of future studies of, for example, digital mapping of properties with higher quality and reliability of the resulting information. This is according to McBratney et al (2003) and Smith et al (2006), who reported a direct relationship between the accuracy of DSM studies with landscape features, and analyzed whether these are represented correctly by the DEMs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adjustment of a DEM to a scale enables the development of future studies of, for example, digital mapping of properties with higher quality and reliability of the resulting information. This is according to McBratney et al (2003) and Smith et al (2006), who reported a direct relationship between the accuracy of DSM studies with landscape features, and analyzed whether these are represented correctly by the DEMs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction performance of classes and soil properties can be influenced by the terrain features, the scale at which pedogenic processes occur in the landscape and whether the DEMs can represent the features in the terrain (McBratney et al, 2003;Smith et al, 2006). Moreover, the error magnitude in the DEM is not always known by users; when this information is available, it is region-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital elevation model (DEM) was extracted from the download system of the Continuo de Elevaciones Mexicano (INEGI, 2007) and resized to each study area. The pixel size was 28.5 x 28.5 m to enhance precision for automated cartography of local soil maps using the nearest neighbor technique (Smith et al, 2006). From the DEM were used to extract slope, aspect, profile curvature, flow, analytical hillshading, convergence index, wetness index and catchment area were generated using IDRISI® and SAGA System (Cimmery, 2007).…”
Section: Maps Of Local Soil Classes and Topographic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the generated maps ranges from 50 to 88 % (Lagacherie & Holmes, 1997;Dobos et al, 2001;Moran & Bui, 2002;Hengl & Rossiter, 2003;Peng et al, 2003;Qi & Zhu, 2003;Schmidt & Hewitt, 2004;Scull et al, 2005;Giasson et al, 2006;Smith et al, 2006;Qi et al, 2006;Ziadat, 2007;Figueiredo et al, 2008;Schmidt et al, 2008;Hansen et al, 2009;Ballabio, 2010;Behrens et al, 2010). These maps produced by DSM are based on scientific data by the extrapolation of soil properties, but do not take local soil knowledge into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software tools for DSM can be divided into three types: (a) general-purpose geostatistics tools such as Gstat (Pebesma, 2004), ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst (ESRI, 2014) and GS plus (Gamma Design Software, 2007); (b) statistical packages such as R and Matlab; and (c) special soil mapping tools such as FuzME (Minasny and McBratney, 2002), SoLIM Solutions (Zhu et al, 1997;Smith et al, 2006;Zhu, 2006) and TAL (Teh, 2002;Sung, 2014). Emergent demands and trends in the DSM field pose new challenges for these software tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%