1995
DOI: 10.1177/095632029500600402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Delayed-Onset Chemotherapy using Famciclovir or Valaciclovir in a Murine Immunosuppression Model for HSV-1

Abstract: SummaryBALB/c mice were immunosuppressed using a dosing regimen of cyclosporin-A previously shown to interfere with T-cell function. HSV-1 was then inoculated into the skin of the ear pinna and the infection allowed to progress for 5 days. In untreated mice, virus replication was observed in both ear tissue and the central nervous system (brainstem). Virus replication continued at high titre in both sites for 15 days, the duration of the experiment. This model was used to investigate the efficacy of famciclovi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This stage of infection might be comparable 18 Intervirology 1997:40:15-21 W utzler/U lbricht/Färhcr Recently, encouraging results in favor of FCV have also been reported by Field et al [12], In a comparative study, in which the compounds were orally administered at 100 mg/kg per day (divided into two doses) for 5 or 10 days to treat HSV-1 infection in immunosuppressed mice, FVC proved to be more effective than VACV at clearing the virus from the ear pinna and brain stem and at preventing the recurrence of infectious virus on cessa tion of therapy. Very similar results were found when the start of treatment was delayed until 5 days after infection -a time when virus replication in the brain stem and ear pinna was well established [19]. The better therapeutic effect of FCV may be due to the prolonged suppression of virus replication after cessation of therapy, an effect that has been shown by Sutton and Boyd [20] for PCV but not for ACV in an experimental HSV-1 infection.…”
Section: Effect O F Antiviral Treatment On Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This stage of infection might be comparable 18 Intervirology 1997:40:15-21 W utzler/U lbricht/Färhcr Recently, encouraging results in favor of FCV have also been reported by Field et al [12], In a comparative study, in which the compounds were orally administered at 100 mg/kg per day (divided into two doses) for 5 or 10 days to treat HSV-1 infection in immunosuppressed mice, FVC proved to be more effective than VACV at clearing the virus from the ear pinna and brain stem and at preventing the recurrence of infectious virus on cessa tion of therapy. Very similar results were found when the start of treatment was delayed until 5 days after infection -a time when virus replication in the brain stem and ear pinna was well established [19]. The better therapeutic effect of FCV may be due to the prolonged suppression of virus replication after cessation of therapy, an effect that has been shown by Sutton and Boyd [20] for PCV but not for ACV in an experimental HSV-1 infection.…”
Section: Effect O F Antiviral Treatment On Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…We confirmed previous observations that the daily water consumption of each mouse was about 1.8 ml of water. The drug was supplied as a 1-mg/ml solution, corresponding to an average daily intake of 100 mg/kg (9). The drug ameliorated negative effects of the viral infection on the general health of the mice as measured by weight loss (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, for patients with less severe disease, an agent that will achieve a better reduction of lesion duration with episodic treatment beyond the 1 to 2 days' reduction achieved with current medications is urgently required (16). Furthermore, a drug which continues to show profound efficacy when given at later stages of herpetic disease would be a new and highly desired standard in the treatment of herpes (10). BAY 57-1293 (N-[5-(aminosulfonyl)-4-methyl-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-N-methyl-2-[4-(2-pyridinyl)phenyl]acetamide) ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%