2006
DOI: 10.1162/edfp.2006.1.3.315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Defined Benefit Pension Incentives and Working Conditions on Teacher Retirement Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Labor economists have developed more systematic evidence of the behavioral impact of defined benefit pensions in other fields, particularly in the private sector (see, e.g., Friedberg and Webb 2005). There has been much less research on teacher pensions, but that which is available indicates strong incentive effects (Furgeson, Strauss, and Vogt 2006;Brown 2008;Podgursky, Ni, and Ehlert 2008).…”
Section: Incentive Effects Of Pension Spikesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Labor economists have developed more systematic evidence of the behavioral impact of defined benefit pensions in other fields, particularly in the private sector (see, e.g., Friedberg and Webb 2005). There has been much less research on teacher pensions, but that which is available indicates strong incentive effects (Furgeson, Strauss, and Vogt 2006;Brown 2008;Podgursky, Ni, and Ehlert 2008).…”
Section: Incentive Effects Of Pension Spikesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been many studies of the effect of current compensation on teacher turnover (e.g., Murnane and Olsen 1990;Stinebrickner 2001;Hanushek, Kain, and Rivkin 2004;Podgursky, Monroe, and Watson 2004), the econometric literature on teacher pensions is very slender. The only published econometric study to date is by Furgeson, Strauss, and Vogt (2006), who find that Pennsylvania teachers responded to pension incentives. 4 In this article, we analyze the incentives embedded in teacher pension systems by examining the pattern of pension wealth accumulation over a teacher's career.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other workers, teachers appear to be sensitive to separation incentives. Furgeson, Strauss, and Vogt's (2006) analysis of Pennsylvania teachers, for example, suggests that a 1% increase in the present value of real pension benefits leads to a 2-3% increase in the probability of retirement.…”
Section: Background On Teacher Pensions and Proposed Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For now, the evidence base is small. Recent empirical studies include Furgeson, Strauss, and Vogt's (2006) examination of teacher retirement behavior and Costrell andPodgursky's (2007, 2009) analyses of pension wealth accumulation. Elsewhere, Kimball, Heneman, and Kellor (2005) discuss how pensions might help attract teachers to the profession; more recently, Hansen (2009) and Loeb, Miller, and Strunk (2009) provide useful overviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing literature on teacher retirement focuses largely on the role of the retirement incentives embedded in pension plans (Furgeson, Strauss and Vogt 2006;Costrell and Podgursky 2009;Costrell and McGee 2010;Brown and Laschever 2012;Brown 2013) and retirement's responsiveness to student performance and school demographics (Hanushek, Kain and Rivkin 2004;Mahler 2012). Though these studies provide clear evidence that teacher labor supply is responsive to pension incentive structures, how these retirement incentives affect student outcomes is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%