2010
DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2010.11889487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Data and Graph Type on Concepts and Visualizations of Variability

Abstract: Recognizing and interpreting variability in data lies at the heart of statistical reasoning. Since graphical displays should facilitate communication about data, statistical literacy should include an understanding of how variability in data can be gleaned from a graph. This paper identifies several types of graphs that students typically encounter-histograms, distribution bar graphs, and value bar charts. These graphs all share the superficial similarity of employing bars, and yet the methods to perceive vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the SRBCI items incorporate figures, and while we are aware that some students find visual interpretation difficult for a variety of reasons ( Chinn and Brewer, 2001 ; Friel et al. , 2001 ; Cooper and Shore, 2010 ), interpreting figures is a fundamental requirement of scientific literacy (and statistical reasoning; Coil et al. , 2010 ; Glazer, 2011 ; Watson, 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the SRBCI items incorporate figures, and while we are aware that some students find visual interpretation difficult for a variety of reasons ( Chinn and Brewer, 2001 ; Friel et al. , 2001 ; Cooper and Shore, 2010 ), interpreting figures is a fundamental requirement of scientific literacy (and statistical reasoning; Coil et al. , 2010 ; Glazer, 2011 ; Watson, 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have shown that students have trouble with distributions and graphical representations (Bakker and Gravemeijer 2004;delMas et al 2007;Hammerman and Rubin 2004;Konold and Higgins 2003;McClain et al 2000). Cooper and Shore (2010) wrote, 'it simply makes good sense to include rich discussions connecting an assortment of graphical displays to their corresponding data sets and methods to judge center and spread' (p. 13).…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alan bilgisi ile öğretim bilgisi arasındaki bu ilişki öğretmen adaylarının istatistiksel kavramlara ilişkin anlamaları ve öğretecekleri konunun daha fazlasını bilmelerini kritik hale getirmektedir (Borko ve diğerleri, 1992;Leavy, 2006). Ancak yapılan çalışmalar öğretmenlerin ve öğretmen adaylarının dağılım kavramı ve bu kavramın ilişkili olduğu diğer kavramların anlaşılması konusunda çeşitli zorluklarının olduğunu göstermektedir (Bakker & Gravemeijer, 2004;Cooper & Shore 2010;Garfield & Ben-Zvi, 2008a;Shaughnessy, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified