2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of customer justice perception and affect on customer citizenship behavior and customer dysfunctional behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
171
2
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
5
171
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributive justice deals with the perceived fairness of the outcomes received (Kumar, 1996;Patterson et al, 2006;Yi & Gong, 2008). In supply chain and relationship management, distributive justice focuses for example on how the benefits and risks are shared between the supplier and manufacturer (Brown et al, 2006;Griffith et al, 2006;Yilmaz et al, 2004).…”
Section: Justice Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Distributive justice deals with the perceived fairness of the outcomes received (Kumar, 1996;Patterson et al, 2006;Yi & Gong, 2008). In supply chain and relationship management, distributive justice focuses for example on how the benefits and risks are shared between the supplier and manufacturer (Brown et al, 2006;Griffith et al, 2006;Yilmaz et al, 2004).…”
Section: Justice Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, interactional justice involves the manner in which an exchange partner is treated during the exchange process (Cohen-Charash & Spector, 2001;Yi & Gong, 2008). In a buyer-supplier relationship, interactional justice refers to the behaviors and the degree of interpersonal sensitivity that supplier's employees exhibit towards buyer's representatives.…”
Section: Justice Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on equity theory, fairness is evident when the ratio of an individual's inputs (benefits) to outputs (efforts) is balanced with the ratio of the other party (Adams, 1965). Applying equity theory to deviant service exchanges, customers invest inputs and receive outcomes while also compare the balance of their own inputs to the balance of the other party (Yi & Gong, 2008). Hence, when employees deviate from organizational rules for customers' sake, customers feel as their inputs to the specific exchange are reduced for the same type of outcome, when compared to other customers' inputs.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%