The effects of cultural factors on innovation in a Thai SME

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to look at a Thai manufacturing small to medium‐sized enterprise (SME) in order to develop a basic understanding of the innovation concept and process in Thailand, and to investigate how the five factors associated with innovation interact with Hofstede's five cultural dimensions to influence the innovation process.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a qualitative methodology, using a case‐study approach.FindingsAll the studies of national culture and innovation potential use Hofstede's dimensions but this study suggests that in Thailand there may be cultural factors other than Hofstede's that influence innovation and that modify the effects of Hofstede's model on innovation. Allied to this, it appears that the traditional cultural values could be shifting, as younger people absorb an increasing amount of influence from Western media. The first finding from this study suggests that Thai SMEs may tend to more effectively produce or adopt incremental innovations rather than radical ones. The second finding is that, if the research company is typical of Thai SMEs, Thai SMEs are likely to experience difficulties with adopting completely novel innovations effectively. This is because four (except the dimension of long versus short‐term orientation) of Hofstede's five Thai cultural dimensions were clearly found to obstruct the innovation process. Also there are some cultural factors peculiar to Thailand, not mentioned by Hofstede, that impact on the innovation process.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper underlines the need to understand local culture and environment, which play a crucial role in the success or failure of innovation activities of firms, particularly SMEs.Originality/valueThere have been very few studies on innovation with reference to Thai SMEs.

A Research on Determining Innovation Factors for SMEs

“…Because of this reason firms place a greater emphasis on innovation in difficult operating environments, characterized by short product cycle, rapid technological change, and intense rivalry (Laforet, 2011). Innovation allows organizations to better meet consumer needs, stay ahead of the competition, capitalize on strategic market opportunities, and align organizational strengths with market opportunities (Rujirawanich et al, 2011). Thus, a detailed research conducted to determine most critical implementation factor.…”

“…Economic Factor (EF): Economic structure plays a crucial role in innovation (Rujirawanich et al, 2011). The financial and economic crisis has impact on all areas of business activities and results in problems with accessing to financial sources which are needed to finance investments, especially for innovations (Lesáková, 2014).…”

Sustainable Leadership Practices Driving Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Thai SMEs

“…The literature also signifies the importance of SMEs as the economic backbone of most economies and calls for further leadership studies in the SME context [40][41][42]. The characteristics and determinants of growth in SMEs have been the focus of much debate among researchers and practitioners [43].…”

Innovativeness of European SMEs: Mission not yet accomplished

“…All cross-country differences could be due to cultural or identity variations supported by Sommer et al (2009) and Rujirawanich et al (2011) as well as differences in the quality of life and overall stability and prosperity of the economy. Interestingly enough, in Greece, which was divided into two parts, many differences exist between the northern part (Thessaloniki) and the southern part (Athens).…”