2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of cross-section dimension n in panel co-integration test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panel cointegration tests can also be divided into two generations. The tests proposed by Kao [42] and Pedroni [43] are two famous representatives of the first generation [44]. Both tests are based on residuals of regression, which can be regarded as an extension of the traditional Engle-Granger two steps cointegration method [45].…”
Section: Panel Cointegration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel cointegration tests can also be divided into two generations. The tests proposed by Kao [42] and Pedroni [43] are two famous representatives of the first generation [44]. Both tests are based on residuals of regression, which can be regarded as an extension of the traditional Engle-Granger two steps cointegration method [45].…”
Section: Panel Cointegration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, panel data of relevant index in 2003-2012 will be based to take empirical analysis of influence of tax arrangements to upgrading and rationalization of industrial structure in China. We check the stationarity of the variables using nonstationary panel data methods [22][23][24][25][26][27]; in particular, according to [22,24], stationarity tests for series should be conducted before performing the panel regression; otherwise the regression may be spurious and this will result in misleading conclusions. And according to the Monte Carlo comparisons by [25,26], the second-generation panel unit root tests proposed by Bai and Ng [24] and Pesaran [28] are robust relatively, so we choose them in our empirical study.…”
Section: Analysis Of Empirical Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a stylized fact that plenty of relationships are dynamic and nonlinear in nature and society, especially in economic and financial systems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. These relationships are usually depicted by nonlinear models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%