2021
DOI: 10.1108/jes-05-2020-0199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of corruption on growth, human development and natural resources sector: empirical evidence from a Bayesian panel VAR for Latin American and Nordic countries

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the effects of corruption on economic growth, human development and natural resources in Latin American and Nordic countries.Design/methodology/approachUsing the hierarchical prior of Gelman et al. (2003), a Bayesian panel Vector AutoRegression (VAR) model is estimated. In addition, two alternative approaches are considered, namely, a panel error correction VAR model and an asymmetric panel VAR model.FindingsThe results reveal some relevant contrasts: (1) in Latin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though less prominent, selected inconclusive contributions have also been reported. Urbina and Rodríguez (2022) provide support for the “sand the wheels” hypothesis and “grease the wheels” hypothesis and no growth impact of corruption across Latina American countries. They further show that corruption stimulates natural resources in Latin American countries but dampens the natural resource sector in Nordic countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though less prominent, selected inconclusive contributions have also been reported. Urbina and Rodríguez (2022) provide support for the “sand the wheels” hypothesis and “grease the wheels” hypothesis and no growth impact of corruption across Latina American countries. They further show that corruption stimulates natural resources in Latin American countries but dampens the natural resource sector in Nordic countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This was, however, not the case with the robust estimators, possibly revealing rather restrictive economic freedom in some BRICS countries. Under such conditions and according to Urbina and Rodr ıguez (2022), it is plausible to contend that corruption may dampen the natural resource sector of BRICS economies with a restrictive rule of law, resulting in a negative growth impact. This inference emerges from the consistent cross-section and IV-GMM bias-corrected estimators in contrast to the benchmark pooled OLS, which ignores critical econometric issues such as heterogeneity, endogeneity, crosssection dependence and small sample bias.…”
Section: Corruption's Effect On Brics Economiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of a possible non-linear impact of corruption on firm performance has not evolved much in the existing literature. As exceptions, Coppier et al (2013) and Urbina and Rodr ıguez (2022) demonstrate that corruption might act as both the grease to and sand in the wheel of productivity and economic growth depending on corruption severity. The common finding is that corruption is the grease to the system in areas with weak institutions and severe corruption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common finding is that corruption is the grease to the system in areas with weak institutions and severe corruption. Government efforts on monitoring corruption are likely to cause greater bureaucratic delays and/or increases in financial burdens on firms for growth because public agents ask for higher bribes in compensation for legal risks (Urbina and Rodr ıguez, 2022;Coppier et al, 2013). Lowering corruption alone, therefore, has a detrimental effect on firms' productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these factors is corruption and institutional quality. In this sense, a group of economists emphasizes the role of institutions in determining the effects of natural resources on human capital (Cabrales and Hauk, 2010; Daniele, 2011; Blanco and Grier, 2012; Cockx and Francken, 2016; Kim and Lin, 2017b; Urbina and Rodriguez, 2021). This group tends to shed doubt on the validity of the resource curse hypothesis on human capital and they assume that this adverse effect might be conditional based on the level of institutional quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%