2006
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arj045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of copulation duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In C. maculatus, females vigorously kick males with their hind legs during mating [42] and this behaviour reduces the copulation duration [43]. Ejaculate size increases with copulation duration and contributes to male reproductive success because it increases female fecundity [44]. Males that are able to copulate for longer and/or produce larger ejaculates would increase their reproductive fitness but suffer a longevity cost [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In C. maculatus, females vigorously kick males with their hind legs during mating [42] and this behaviour reduces the copulation duration [43]. Ejaculate size increases with copulation duration and contributes to male reproductive success because it increases female fecundity [44]. Males that are able to copulate for longer and/or produce larger ejaculates would increase their reproductive fitness but suffer a longevity cost [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In C. maculatus, a species closely related to C. chinensis, a trend for decreasing female remating propensity with increasing ejaculate weight was found (Edvardsson and Canal 2006). Also, males of the common dung fly, Sepsis cynipsea copulated longer with females, for example older females and mated females, for which the risk of sperm competition was expected to be higher (Martin and Hosken 2002).…”
Section: Hosken and Wardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues may hamper the identification of the processes of sexual selection acting on variation in these traits, thereby limiting the certainty of inferences about their evolution (Bertin and Fairbairn 2007). For example, while it is known that male genital spines in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus damage the female during mating, the consequences of between-male variation in this trait remain unclear (Morrow et al 2003;Edvardsson and Tregenza 2005;Edvardsson and Canal 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%