1988
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90379-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of continuous administration of murine interleukin-1α in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
1
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 Otterness et al 38 and Mrosovsky et al 39 observed cachexia-causing effects of IL-1 when it is administrated to animals. Transfection of a cachectic tumor cell line (colon-26) with the gene for IL-1 receptor antagonist failed to abolish the capacity of the tumor to produce cachexia.…”
Section: Interleukin-1 (Il-1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 Otterness et al 38 and Mrosovsky et al 39 observed cachexia-causing effects of IL-1 when it is administrated to animals. Transfection of a cachectic tumor cell line (colon-26) with the gene for IL-1 receptor antagonist failed to abolish the capacity of the tumor to produce cachexia.…”
Section: Interleukin-1 (Il-1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include decreased locomotor activity (Otterness et al, 1988), exploration (Spadaro and Dunn, 1990;Dunn et al, 1991), and feeding (McCarthy et al, 1985), behaviors that may be displayed by fearful or anxious animals. These well-documented findings raised the question of whether IL-1 may mediate fear or anxiety-like behavior in animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rhIL-1/3 treatment was also associated with a decrease in food intake and body weight gain, which is in good agreement with previous reports. 36 - 38 The effect of rhIL-10 on body weight gain was present during the first 2 days of infusion but had been lost by day 3 of treatment. This is in line with studies demonstrating that tolerance to the anorectic effects of IL-1 develops within a few days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%