1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01017705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of computer administration and identification on the Job Descriptive Index (JDI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result the scores on the Pay and Promotion scales were doubled to equate the possible ranges on the five scales. The scores were then summed to obtain five scale scores, resulting in each scale having a potential range of 0 to 54 (Kantor, 1991).…”
Section: Job Satisfaction Of Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result the scores on the Pay and Promotion scales were doubled to equate the possible ranges on the five scales. The scores were then summed to obtain five scale scores, resulting in each scale having a potential range of 0 to 54 (Kantor, 1991).…”
Section: Job Satisfaction Of Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators have speculated that computer administration might increase perceptions of the measurement situation as private or anonymous (e.g., Evan & Miller, 1969;Griffith & Northcraft, 1994;Kantor, 1991;Lucas, Mullin, Luna, & Mclnroy, 1977;Robinson & Walters, 1986;Turner et al, 1998). A large literature shows anonymity reduces social desirability distortion and increases self-disclosure (Cannavale, Scarr, & Pepitone, 1970;Diener, Fraser, Beaman, & Kelem, 1976;Lindskold & Finch, 1982;Mathes & Guest, 1976;Rosenfeld, Giacalone, & Riordan, 1992;Singer, Brush, & Lublin, 1965;White, 1977;Zerbe & Paulhus, 1987).…”
Section: Social Desirability Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the scores on the Pay and Promotion scales were doubled to equate the possible ranges on the five scales. The scores were then summed to obtain five scale scores, resulting in each scale having a potential range of 0 to 54 (Kantor 1991). As shown in Table 2, the scales on the JS instrument pertaining to Co-workers, Supervisors, Pay The results were compared using a scoring system for a general level of JS, developed and used by Pennington and Riley (1991:24).…”
Section: Quantitative Results On Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%