2018
DOI: 10.1177/0309364617706749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of common footwear on stance-phase mechanical properties of the prosthetic foot-shoe system

Abstract: Shoes altered prosthesis mechanical characteristics in the sagittal and frontal planes, suggesting that shoe type should be controlled or reported in research comparing prostheses. Understanding of how different shoes could alter certain gait-related characteristics of prostheses may aid decisions on footwear made by clinicians and prosthesis users. Clinical relevance Shoes can alter function of the prosthetic foot-shoe system in unexpected and sometimes undesirable ways, often causing similar behavior across … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, carbon fiber reinforced polymers now incorporated in many energy storage-and-return (ESAR) and dynamic prosthetic feet (e.g., Flex-Foot series, Össur), can demonstrate decreased net energy loss relative to other feet constructed of conventional composites and polymers (e.g., Solid Ankle Cushion Heel (SACH) series, Otto Bock, or Seattle Lightfoot, Seattle Systems, USA) 3539 . The hypothesis was that modifications in mechanical function would be reflected in user performance 18, 20 , such as reduced metabolic cost of gait 35, 36 .…”
Section: Optimizing Passive Prosthesis Design Through Parametric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, carbon fiber reinforced polymers now incorporated in many energy storage-and-return (ESAR) and dynamic prosthetic feet (e.g., Flex-Foot series, Össur), can demonstrate decreased net energy loss relative to other feet constructed of conventional composites and polymers (e.g., Solid Ankle Cushion Heel (SACH) series, Otto Bock, or Seattle Lightfoot, Seattle Systems, USA) 3539 . The hypothesis was that modifications in mechanical function would be reflected in user performance 18, 20 , such as reduced metabolic cost of gait 35, 36 .…”
Section: Optimizing Passive Prosthesis Design Through Parametric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, footwear may substantially affect regional and overall stiffness and damping of prosthetic feet, in some instances normalizing the mechanical function across designs 35, 37, 39, 70 . Additionally, the choice of suspension system and constituent components 71 will play a role in determining the residuum-prosthesis interface properties and behavior 72, 73 , and this is especially relevant with the advent of bone-anchored prostheses (osseointegration) 74 .…”
Section: Optimizing Passive Prosthesis Design Through Parametric Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unknown how changes to alignment affect preferred stiffness; this is a potential avenue for future study. Similarly, we elected not to use a shoe on the prosthetic foot to facilitate complete control of stiffness adjustments, but shoes can add substantial series compliance [ 15 ], which would likely affect both preferred stiffness and JND. Stiffness preference was assessed at a steady speed on a treadmill, and may differ during over-ground walking with frequent stops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ankle could be commanded to change stiffness by either the experimenter, who could communicate with the onboard computer ( Raspberry Pi Zero , Raspberry Pi Foundation, Cambridgeshire UK) over WiFi, or directly by the subject, using a small dial which could rotate indefinitely and had no absolute reference. The ankle was worn without a shoe to avoid additional compliance and confounding factors [ 15 ]. Instead, a 6 mm piece of shoe material ( SolFlex crepe , Shore A durometer 50–55, SoleTech, Nahant, MA, US) was epoxied to the bottom of the foot to aid in shock absorption, and a thin tread ( Diamond , durometer 50–55, SoleTech) was epoxied below that shoe material for traction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the data collection, no shoes or footwear were used to avoid their influence on the participant’s gait. 13 Furthermore, having the participants walk without footwear mimicked their daily life of walking without shoes in their home.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%