1957
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/42.2.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Combined Radiations on Crossing Over in Drosophila Melanogaster

Abstract: N attempts at an experimental approach to the problem of the mechanism of I crossing over many modifying agents have been used : temperature (PLOUGH 1917), aging (BERGNER 1928), inversions (STEINBERG 1936), mineral content (BROWN-ING 1949), and radiation (MULLER 1925). As diverse as are these agents, they all have one effect in common. They modify the rate of crossing over in either the region of the kinetochore or the region very distal to it. In most cases there is observed a pattern of change which KIKKAWA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also apparent that movement of the formerly distal C U -W ~ region near the remaining 10% of the proximal heterochromatin yields, instead of an increase, a pronounced decrease in this region. It may be necessary to invoke an additional effect of radiation (perhaps on coiling and consequently pairing, as proposed by YOST and BENNEYAN 1957) to account for the tendency of the hypothesized lesions in proximal euchromatin to be converted to crossovers instead of merely being repaired. (BATEMAN and CHANDLEY (1965) have suggested, on the basis of dose-response studies, that there are opposing forces operating in this region.)…”
Section: Proximal Increase and Distal Decreasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also apparent that movement of the formerly distal C U -W ~ region near the remaining 10% of the proximal heterochromatin yields, instead of an increase, a pronounced decrease in this region. It may be necessary to invoke an additional effect of radiation (perhaps on coiling and consequently pairing, as proposed by YOST and BENNEYAN 1957) to account for the tendency of the hypothesized lesions in proximal euchromatin to be converted to crossovers instead of merely being repaired. (BATEMAN and CHANDLEY (1965) have suggested, on the basis of dose-response studies, that there are opposing forces operating in this region.)…”
Section: Proximal Increase and Distal Decreasementioning
confidence: 99%