2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20160405.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Cognitive Task Complexity on Learners’ Performance

Abstract: In the field of task-based language teaching, sequencing tasks is of substantial importance. One of the proposals for sequencing tasks is cognitive task complexity. Robinson, as one of the proponents of sequencing tasks based on cognitive task complexity, distinguishes between three factors of: task complexity (i.e. the intrinsic cognitive demands of the task), task conditions (i.e. features of tasks which are determined by the situational setting and conditions in which they take place), and task difficulty (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Objective task complexity comprises code complexity, such as syntactic and lexical demands constituted by the writing task, cognitive complexity, like the mental processing demanded by the task, including the availability of relevant knowledge, and communicative stress generated, for example, by the number of participants involved and criteria for correctness used to assess the performance (Candlin, 1987: p. 10). Similar distinctions can be found in other studies, such as Brindley (1987), Nunan (1993), Mangos and Steele-Johnson (2001), or Sanajoo and Asadi (2016), all indicating that task complexity, in general, can be determined by analyzing the task into features that supposedly generate difficulty.…”
Section: Conceptualising Task Difficultysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Objective task complexity comprises code complexity, such as syntactic and lexical demands constituted by the writing task, cognitive complexity, like the mental processing demanded by the task, including the availability of relevant knowledge, and communicative stress generated, for example, by the number of participants involved and criteria for correctness used to assess the performance (Candlin, 1987: p. 10). Similar distinctions can be found in other studies, such as Brindley (1987), Nunan (1993), Mangos and Steele-Johnson (2001), or Sanajoo and Asadi (2016), all indicating that task complexity, in general, can be determined by analyzing the task into features that supposedly generate difficulty.…”
Section: Conceptualising Task Difficultysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Metacognition had a strong and good impact on children's reading awareness and comprehension. Independent language learning necessitated the acquisition of metacognitive knowledge [59]. Building learners' autonomy at various phases of language learning is vital for improving their good points in second language learning and controlling their weak points in activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construct is measured by time and commitment. The cognitive construct describes the learner's mental input and conceptual knowledge during class activities (Sanajoo, 2016). Therefore, the learner's attention and self-determination are a few components of cognitive engagement (Philp & Duchesne, 2016).…”
Section: Task Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%