The Effects of Cognitive Styles on Naïve Impetus Theory Application Degrees of Pre-Service Science Teachers

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between pre-service science teachers' Field Dependent or Field Independent (FD/FI) cognitive styles and the application of degrees of naive impetus theory. The sample consisted of 122 pre-service science teachers (97 females and 25 males) who were enrolled in the Introductory Physics course required by the Science Education program. Data were collected in two successive years, after the completion of the required Introductory Physics undergraduate courses, in 2008 and 2009. The Group Embedded Figure Test and Impetus Theory Application Test (a two-tier-type test) were administered to assess the FD/FI tendency of students and to determine the degree students applied the naïve impetus theory, respectively. Initial results showed that a majority of students had made use of the native impetus theory repeatedly. The results also indicated that the degree to which students applied the naïve impetus theory was statistically related to their FD/FI cognitive styles. The findings of this research showed that there existed a statistically significant difference between the FI and FD students' degree of applying the naïve impetus theory in favor of FI students. However, the test score gap between FI and FD students remained almost constant regardless of the testing instruments utilized in this study. © 2013 National Science Council, Taiwan

Conceptual Understanding Levels of Students with Different Cognitive Styles: An Evaluation in Terms of Different Measurement Techniques

“…The findings obtained from this study showed that students with fieldindependent cognitive style were significantly more successful than the students with field-dependent cognitive style statistically in terms of scores obtained from both Life Based Concept Test and Force Concept Map. When the findings of the related literature are examined, it is seen that the students with field-independent cognitive style in science have a higher level of achievement in terms of conceptual understanding and achievement than the field-dependent students (Al-Naeme, 1991;Altiparmak, 2009;Ates & Cataloglu, 2007;Ates & Karacam, 2005;Cataloglu & Ates, 2013;Crow & Piper,1983;Celik, 2010;Ozarslan & Bilgin, 2016;Prayekti, 2015;Stamovlasis, Tsitsipis & Papageorgiou, 2009;Ziane, 1996).…”

Do students with different cognitive styles have similar levels of statistical thinking?

“…Each student's cognitive style is different; therefore, learning must facilitate all types of student cognitive styles (Krisdiantoro & Prihatnani, 2019). Students' cognitive styles' differences are significantly correlated with problem-solving, students' learning outcomes, and mathematics appreciation (Cataloglu & Ates, 2014;Klaczynski, 1994;Marlissa & Widjajanti, 2015;Tinajero & Páramo, 1998).…”

Subtraction Performances of Primary School Prospective Mathematics Teachers Having Different Cognitive Styles

“…That's why it is probable to obtain different results in the process of investigating these people having different cognitive characteristics. As a matter of fact, it appears in conducted studies that field dependent and independent people reveal different results in terms of investigated variable [3,4,5,8,26].…”