Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450517-0/50122-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of coal and diesel particulates on the weathering loss of two major building stones in the United Kingdom—A comparative microcatchment study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The environmental assessment of the urban surrounds where heritage buildings are located is one preventive measure for façade conservation (Fort et al, 2004;Ghedini et al, 2011;Sablier and Garrigues, 2014). The perception of façade soiling has been evaluated with non-destructive techniques: applying greyscale in photographic images to decipher the rates of re-soiling associated with cleaning/soiling cycles (Searle et al, 2000), monitoring the progressive decline in lightness (L*) values over time (Grossi et al, 2003), quantifying soiling with integrated digital photography and image processing (Thornbush and Viles, 2004;Thornbush, 2010;Janvier-Badosa et al, 2013), or assigning lightness (L*) perception based on a soiling index (Thornbush, 2014). Visual impact resulting from façade aesthetic decay entails establishing aesthetic tolerance thresholds in terms of human sensibility to colour patterns (Grossi and Brimblecombe, 2008;Grossi et al, 2003;Grossi and Brimblecombe, 2004), estimating when (Marie, 2013) or exactly where on façades cleaning operations are needed (Swann, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental assessment of the urban surrounds where heritage buildings are located is one preventive measure for façade conservation (Fort et al, 2004;Ghedini et al, 2011;Sablier and Garrigues, 2014). The perception of façade soiling has been evaluated with non-destructive techniques: applying greyscale in photographic images to decipher the rates of re-soiling associated with cleaning/soiling cycles (Searle et al, 2000), monitoring the progressive decline in lightness (L*) values over time (Grossi et al, 2003), quantifying soiling with integrated digital photography and image processing (Thornbush and Viles, 2004;Thornbush, 2010;Janvier-Badosa et al, 2013), or assigning lightness (L*) perception based on a soiling index (Thornbush, 2014). Visual impact resulting from façade aesthetic decay entails establishing aesthetic tolerance thresholds in terms of human sensibility to colour patterns (Grossi and Brimblecombe, 2008;Grossi et al, 2003;Grossi and Brimblecombe, 2004), estimating when (Marie, 2013) or exactly where on façades cleaning operations are needed (Swann, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning in the 1970s, European policy aimed to lower SO 2 emissions [5] and the consumption of (particularly sulfur-high) coal. Vehicle emissions have since become the main source of airborne pollution [6], essentially nitrogen oxides and particulates, that are enough to trigger building materials decay [7]. Strategies designed to conserve the cultural heritage should be preceded by an understanding of air quality trends and the composition of background urban aerosols, which entails systematic monitoring of the environmental conditions prevailing around heritage buildings [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%