2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of chronic physical activity interventions on executive functions in children aged 3–7 years: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stroop, Go/no-go, and Flanker tasks are the most commonly used tools to evaluate the performance (reaction time and/or accuracy) of inhibitory control (Chen et al, 2020). The present review suggests that both acute and chronic exercises are beneficial for inhibitory control, with small magnitudes (Xue et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020). The mechanisms of action of acute and chronic exercises on inhibitory control are unclear, but a possible explanation regarding the effects is attributed to the features of exercises; that is, whether acute or chronic exercises are used can cause an individual to need to complete more complex tasks than everyday multitasking, and this operation mode relies on the non-automatic selection of the process during exercises, which facilitates the speed of reaction of inhibition control (Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The Stroop, Go/no-go, and Flanker tasks are the most commonly used tools to evaluate the performance (reaction time and/or accuracy) of inhibitory control (Chen et al, 2020). The present review suggests that both acute and chronic exercises are beneficial for inhibitory control, with small magnitudes (Xue et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020). The mechanisms of action of acute and chronic exercises on inhibitory control are unclear, but a possible explanation regarding the effects is attributed to the features of exercises; that is, whether acute or chronic exercises are used can cause an individual to need to complete more complex tasks than everyday multitasking, and this operation mode relies on the non-automatic selection of the process during exercises, which facilitates the speed of reaction of inhibition control (Li et al, 2017).…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…983) than acute exercise (g = 0.415) in children and adolescents with ADHD. Meanwhile, three recent reviews validated a small positive effect of chronic exercise programmes on overall EFs of the general population, including children aged 3–7 years (g = 0.35) [ 92 ], preadolescent children aged 6–12 years (g = 0.24) [ 20 ] and children and adolescents aged 6–17 years (d = 0.20) [ 16 ]. Interestingly, the beneficial effects of chronic exercise intervention appear more robust in ADHD than in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost ten years ago, [ 102 ] reviewed, in detail, the effects of physical activity on executive functions; they found positive relationships between physical activity and executive functions, especially consistent with inhibitory control (deliberate suppression of impulsive responses), although other functions showed occasional or no effects. More recently, on the one hand, positive effects of physical activity on executive functions have been reported in preschool children (age 3–5 years), kindergarten children, children aged 3–7 years, preadolescent pupils (6–12 years), and older adults [ 2 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 ]. On the other hand, another work reported no significant effects of physical activity (Daily Mile™) on fluency in math or the executive function in children (mean age = 8.99 ± 0.5) [ 107 ].…”
Section: Learning Stimulation Based On Neuroscientific Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%