1999
DOI: 10.1207/s15326888chc2804_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Childhood Cancer and Its Treatment on Two Objective Measures of Psychological..

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Younger age at diagnosis and being female became recognized as major risk factors for greater impairment among children treated for ALL or a brain tumor [Meadows et al, 1981;Robison et al, 1984;Ellenberg et al, 1987;Mulhern et al, 1987Mulhern et al, , 1992Jannoun and Bloom, 1990;Waber et al, 1990;Butler et al, 1994]. Both of these findings were replicated by later studies [Butler et al,1999;Leung et al, 2000;von der Weid et al, 2003].…”
Section: Brain Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Younger age at diagnosis and being female became recognized as major risk factors for greater impairment among children treated for ALL or a brain tumor [Meadows et al, 1981;Robison et al, 1984;Ellenberg et al, 1987;Mulhern et al, 1987Mulhern et al, , 1992Jannoun and Bloom, 1990;Waber et al, 1990;Butler et al, 1994]. Both of these findings were replicated by later studies [Butler et al,1999;Leung et al, 2000;von der Weid et al, 2003].…”
Section: Brain Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several excellent reviews are available supporting this approach to understanding neurocognitive deficits among children surviving ALL and brain tumours, which suggest that children surviving brain tumours are at greater risk for more severe deficits because of the increased aggressiveness of their therapy and, in particular, the continued use of CRT [4][5][6]. These reviews and more recent studies have further emphasized that the severity of deficits is also dependent upon patient age and gender, with girls and younger patients being more vulnerable [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Neurocognitive Late Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children at higher risk for cognitive sequelae include those younger than 6 to 8 years, particularly girls (Butler, Rizzi, & Bandilla, 1999;Gamis & Nesbit, 1991;Leung et al, 2000;Palmer et al, 2001;Ris, Packer, Goldwein, Jones-Wallace, & Boyett, 2001); those who received central nervous system radiation (Gamis & Nesbit, 1991;Lockwood, Bell, & Colegrove, 1999); and those with a combination of these 2 factors. In addition, children receiving concurrent intrathecal methotrexate or high-dose intravenous methotrexate and those with computerized axial tomography scan abnormalities have additional risk factors for cognitive sequelae (Gamis & Nesbit, 1991).…”
Section: Neurocognitive Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 99%