2001
DOI: 10.1159/000052677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Changes in Speaking Rate on Nasal Airflow and the Perception of Nasality

Abstract: The effects of variation in speaking rate on relative nasal airflow (percent nasal flow) and on the perception of nasality were examined. In addition, the effects of gender and speech rate elicitation techniques (metronome-controlled, self-controlled) were examined. Nineteen normal speakers each produced a stimulus phrase containing nonnasal sounds. Oral and nasal airflows were measured using the Rothenberg aerodynamic system. Results indicated that percent nasal flow and perception of nasality were both great… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
20
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Fletcher and Daly's finding that nasalance increased as speaking rate slowed (1976) and the consistent reports that perceived nasality increased at slow speaking rates (Brancewicz & Reich, 1989;Colton & Cooker, 1968;Goberman et al, 2001), it was expected that nasalance may increase as speaking rate slows for both oral and nasal sentences in the present study.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on Fletcher and Daly's finding that nasalance increased as speaking rate slowed (1976) and the consistent reports that perceived nasality increased at slow speaking rates (Brancewicz & Reich, 1989;Colton & Cooker, 1968;Goberman et al, 2001), it was expected that nasalance may increase as speaking rate slows for both oral and nasal sentences in the present study.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The study revealed an increase in peak nasal airflow and percent nasal airflow at slow as compared to normal and fast speaking rate conditions (Goberman et al, 2001). …”
Section: Aerodynamic Measures Of Vp Function and Rate Variationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations