1978
DOI: 10.2307/2402786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Canopy Structure on Stemflow, Throughfall and Interception Loss in a Young Sitka Spruce Plantation

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. SUMMARY(1) The partitioning of incident precipitation into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss was assessed in a 14-year-old Picea sitchensis plantation in South Scotla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
96
1
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
96
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of the relations between tree structure and tree function, direct throughfall and stemflow induce spatial variability of rainfall water at the ground surface (e.g. [3,49,83] figure 3b) which has been correlated to the distribution of superficial fine roots [49] and soil water uptake [10]. Rainfall interception may therefore be regarded as the first step of water resource partitioning between plants, i.e.…”
Section: Rainfall Interceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the relations between tree structure and tree function, direct throughfall and stemflow induce spatial variability of rainfall water at the ground surface (e.g. [3,49,83] figure 3b) which has been correlated to the distribution of superficial fine roots [49] and soil water uptake [10]. Rainfall interception may therefore be regarded as the first step of water resource partitioning between plants, i.e.…”
Section: Rainfall Interceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of interception studies have been studied in tropical rainforest (Hutjes et al 1990;Jetten 1996), seasonal temperate rainforest (Link et al 2004), temperate broadleaf (Hörmann et al 1996) and temperate conifer forests (Rutter et al 1972;Valente et al 1997). The majority of interception studies in temperate conifer canopies have been research in relatively young plantation forests in Europe (Ford and Deans, 1978;Gash and Stewart 1977;Gash et al 1980;Johnson 1990;Kelliher et al 1992;Rutter et al 1972;Viville et al 1993). Most interception studies in temperate conifer canopies have been studies in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees can create gradients in soil moisture [4][5][6], temperature [7,8], texture [9], carbon (C) and nutrient accumulation and turnover [10][11][12], understory species composition through spatially distinct effects via litter accumulation [1,12,13], stemflow and throughfall [14,15], light and precipitation interception [16][17][18] and root distribution [8,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%