2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of broiler catching method on breast meat quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All treatments presented pH 24 values between 5.87 and 5.94 and no individual breast samples had breast meat with pH 24 values below 5.7. Values of pH obtained in this study are comparable with those reported in previous studies on different broiler strains (Van Laack et al, 2000;Schilling et al, 2008;Corzo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Ph and Colorsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All treatments presented pH 24 values between 5.87 and 5.94 and no individual breast samples had breast meat with pH 24 values below 5.7. Values of pH obtained in this study are comparable with those reported in previous studies on different broiler strains (Van Laack et al, 2000;Schilling et al, 2008;Corzo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Ph and Colorsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…No significant strain or sex effects were observed in muscle pH 15 (Table 2). On average, no treatments had pH 15 values lower than 6.0 (Schilling et al, 2008), suggesting that no protein denaturation issues existed within strain or sex. Previous studies have reported that lower pH (5.7) at 24 h postmortem indicates poor meat quality that is characterized by protein damage, lighter meat color, and reduced WHC, all of those being typical characteristics of pale, soft, and exudative meat (Van Laack et al, 2000).…”
Section: Ph and Colormentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, the vacuum-sealed samples were cooked in a water bath kettle set at 85 • C until an internal temperature of 77 • C. After cooking, residual moisture was absorbed from each sample with filter papers and the samples were re-weighted. Cooking loss was calculated as a percentage: [(raw weight − cooked weight)/raw weight] × 100, as described by Schilling et al (2008). Then, cooked samples were cooled to room temperature, from which at the same location rectangular-shaped samples [2 cm (length) × 1 cm (width) × 1 cm (thickness)] were removed to measure tenderness using a TA-XT2 texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK) (Molette et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Meat Quality Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A portable pH meter (HI9023, Hanna Instruments, Padova, Italy) equipped with an insertion glass electrode(FC 230B, Hanna Instruments) was used to measure pH at 45 min postmortem (pH 45min ) and 24 h postmortem (ultimate pH; pHu). The determination method was described by Schilling et al (2008). The pH probe was inserted at an angle of 45 degrees into the pectoralis major and rinsed with deionised water between samples.…”
Section: Meat Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%