The effects of brand origin and country-of-manufacture on consumers' institutional perceptions and purchase decision-making

Abstract

PurposeIndustry-wide crises involving consumer products place consumers at risk. Consumers rely on institutions that constrain corporate practice and control product quality to reduce risk. As institutions vary by country, country-of-origin (COO) acts as a salient cue for consumers to identify institutional quality and thus evaluate risk when making purchase decisions. However, in the era of globalisation, identification of institutional quality becomes complex as global value chains involve different countries such as brand origin (BO) and country-of-manufacture (COM). Therefore, this research investigates how BO and COM individually and jointly affect consumers' institutional perceptions and subsequent purchase decision-making in the presence of systemic risk.Design/methodology/approachThis research includes three studies (n = 764) employing surveys and choice modelling experiments with samples from China and the USA.FindingsThe results show that BO and COM relate to different institutional perceptions. BO evokes perceptions of legitimacy and the regulatory environment, while COM evokes perceptions of the normative and the regulatory environment. The combination of BO and COM determines how institutional quality is communicated and further affects consumers' legitimacy perceptions, preferences and willingness to pay a price premium.Originality/valueThis research contributes to understanding the effect of BO and COM in the context of complex value chains from an institutional perspective. It also provides implications for leveraging complex COO cues with BO and COM information to improve consumers' institutional perceptions.

The dual impetus for perceived brand globalness and brand competence in a rapidly changing environment: the role of Brand-Nation Connection

“…On the one hand, the association between a brand and its nation reflects the origin characteristics dominance, which can invoke the brand's local associations of trustworthiness, thus triggering the perceptions of brand competence (Kolbl et al, 2020). On the other hand, the country of origin can serve as an important quality cue (Balabanis and Diamantopoulos, 2011;Chen et al, 2021) that allows consumers to transfer specific nation-related emotions to a brand, thus enhancing consumers' evaluations of the brand and products from that nation (Chen et al, 2014). Specifically, consumers can infer the Dual impetus for brand competence attributes of a brand and its products from country of origin cues (Chen et al, 2021), and the brand's performance features such as quality, reliability, consistency and prestige are key factors in inferring brand competence (Kervyn et al, 2012).…”

The Effect of Brand Origin on Trust in Advertisement and Attitudes towards Advertisement: The Roles of Consumer Ethnocentrism, Cosmopolitanism and Xenocentrism

“…It offers corporate support to branding activities such as planning, designing, and marketing that guide and influence practices in production facilities. For this reason, the contribution of brand origin to the identity and image of brands also includes an assessment of the overall quality of the relevant corporate environment (Chen, Wright, Gao, Liu, & Mather, 2021). Samiee, Shimp and Sharma (2005) made significant contributions to the literature in brand origin.…”

Understanding Chinese consumers' pre-purchase value expectations: the role of country of origin effect

“…Furthermore, it might be challenging for a customer to judge the service of a foreign firm that recently entered the market because they do not have sufficient information about the new entrant. Being a relatively simple and easy-to-obtain cue, COO is more likely to be used by customers to evaluate unfamiliar brands in the international marketplace (Chen et al , 2020). COO is often associated with reliability, safety and durability which can reduce perceived purchase risks (Adina et al , 2015).…”