1981
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Bevel Angulation on Marginal Integrity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean overall 3-D results ranged from 36 to 53 microns for the different groups (Table 4). These results coincide well with earlier publications on conventional castings on abutment teeth, presenting a mean value from 50 up to some few hundred microns of marginal openings (McLean & von Fraunhofer, 1971;Willis & NichoUs, 1980;Kashani, Khera & Gulker, 1981;Fransson, Oilo & Gjeitanger, 1985;Schiffleger etal, 1985;Matty, Tjan & Fox, 1989;Karlsson, 1993;GeVoard etal, 1994). A major part of the present 3-D displacement was due to horizontal distortion, whereas the vertical gaps were of smaller magnitudes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mean overall 3-D results ranged from 36 to 53 microns for the different groups (Table 4). These results coincide well with earlier publications on conventional castings on abutment teeth, presenting a mean value from 50 up to some few hundred microns of marginal openings (McLean & von Fraunhofer, 1971;Willis & NichoUs, 1980;Kashani, Khera & Gulker, 1981;Fransson, Oilo & Gjeitanger, 1985;Schiffleger etal, 1985;Matty, Tjan & Fox, 1989;Karlsson, 1993;GeVoard etal, 1994). A major part of the present 3-D displacement was due to horizontal distortion, whereas the vertical gaps were of smaller magnitudes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…More vibration and resistance of the milling axis during preparation could affect the accuracy of the milling procedure. Furthermore, the castable resin pattern of this study, used in casting specimens instead of the wax pattern, might attribute to the smaller marginal gap values of the casting group than is reported in other studies [29,36]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Smaller marginal gaps produce less gingival irritation [23,24] and cement washout [25,26], improving the clinical outcome and longevity of the restoration [27,28,29,30,31]. Subgingival marginal discrepancies in implant-supported restorations are related to changes in the ecologic environment, that may contribute to the occurrence of peri-implantitis or to bone loss in the marginal portion of the implant [24,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a trend toward decreased crown elevation with die-spacing seems clear, the many technique variables involved in these stages make a clear assessment of the magnitude of the change difficult. Differences in margin design have been shown in experimental 22 and theoretical studies [23][24][25][26] to result in differences in crown seating. Increased convergence angle also favo u r e d decreased crown elevation in the study of Eames et al 2 Studies have further demonstrated variations in the seating of cast restorations due to the various materials and techniques involved in the impression, die construction and casting procedures.…”
Section: Die-spacing and Crown Seatingmentioning
confidence: 99%