2002
DOI: 10.1177/001112870204800306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Behavioral/Cognitive-Behavioral Programs on Recidivism

Abstract: The CDATE project coded studies of treatment/intervention programs in prison, jail, probation, or parole settings reported from 1968 through 1996. Meta-analyses were conducted on the 69 primary research studies on the effectiveness of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment in reducing recidivism for offenders. Results on this heterogeneous collection of studies show that this treatment is associated with reduced recidivism rates. However, this effect is mainly due to cognitive-behavioral interventions r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
5
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As has become customary, each summary effect size originally reported as a function of r was converted to a z, because "the sampling distribution of z(r)-scores is assumed to approach normality, whereas the sampling distribution for r is skewed for all values other than zero" (Pratt & Cullen, 2000, p. 940; also see explanations by Hall, 1995;Pearson, Lipton, Cleland, & Yee, 2002;Rosenthal, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has become customary, each summary effect size originally reported as a function of r was converted to a z, because "the sampling distribution of z(r)-scores is assumed to approach normality, whereas the sampling distribution for r is skewed for all values other than zero" (Pratt & Cullen, 2000, p. 940; also see explanations by Hall, 1995;Pearson, Lipton, Cleland, & Yee, 2002;Rosenthal, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Second, drug treatment provided to offenders has at least moderate effects in reducing drug use and criminal activity and in improving other areas of social functioning. [12][13][14][15][16] Finally, coerced clients and those who may not recognize or acknowledge that they have a drug problem can, through treatment participation and interaction with other clients, become engaged in treatment and do as well as voluntary clients. 17,18 Although the three assumptions do have empirical support, much more remains to be known about the external pressures and the internal perceptions of coerced treatment to determine the conditions under which coerced treatment is effective, to ensure that as many clients as possible benefit from treatment and to use treatment and criminal justice resources efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses, in particular, have highlighted the effectiveness of CBT in addressing sexual offending (Lösel & Schumucker, 2005;Walker, McGovern, Poey, & Otis, 2005), as well as generalist offending involving property or violent misdemeanors (Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005;Pearson, Lipton, Cleland, & Yee, 2002;Redondo, Sánchez-Meca, & Garrido, 1999). CBT allows individuals to challenge and restructure thoughts and attitudes associated with their offending, recognize and appropriately respond to the range of triggers associated with their offending, and practice newly developed competencies and skills aimed at promoting a pro-social lifestyle (Milkman & Wanberg, 2007).…”
Section: Specialist Group Therapy For Psychological Factors Associatementioning
confidence: 99%