The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdx025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Banning Advertising in Junk Food Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, by not including health benefits, our results are robust to substitution effects where consumers switch to other unhealthy products. For example, Dubois, Griffith, and O'Connell (2018) show that the health benefits from banning advertising on potato chips are likely to be mitigated by consumers switching to other junk foods. By not including health benefits in our consumer welfare metric, it is as if we have assumed that SSB health benefits are zero or have been completely offset by substitution.…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, by not including health benefits, our results are robust to substitution effects where consumers switch to other unhealthy products. For example, Dubois, Griffith, and O'Connell (2018) show that the health benefits from banning advertising on potato chips are likely to be mitigated by consumers switching to other junk foods. By not including health benefits in our consumer welfare metric, it is as if we have assumed that SSB health benefits are zero or have been completely offset by substitution.…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for this, in Section 4, we estimate a structural model of demand and supply in order to shed light on the welfare effects of demand inducement in the presence of important real-world distortions: market power, strategic interactions, negotiated prices, insured demand, and behavioral hazard. 9 In this dimension, our approach adds to several recent studies on causal welfare effects of marketing in oligopoly settings: e.g., Dubois et al (2018) examine the effects of a ban on junk food advertising; and Shapiro (2018), Sinkinson and Starc (2018), and Alpert et al (2015) estimate causal effects of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) on drug utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent papers (e.g Dubois et al (2018)Shapiro (2018);Sinkinson and Starc (2018)) focused on television advertising have explicitly focused on the possibility that such ads can have spillover effects across brands in a category.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many empirical papers in the literature study the channels through which advertising influences consumer demand, that is, whether advertising gives information about a product or affects utility from the product. 7 More recently, researchers have studied the effects of advertising in an equilibrium framework for different contexts: Goeree (2008) for the personal computer market; Dubois et al (2014) for junk food markets; and Gordon and Hartmann (2013) and Moshary (2015) for the U.S. elections. A paper that is closely related to ours is Hastings et al (2013), who also study advertising in a privatized government program (the privatized social security market in Mexico).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%