2002
DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2002.120419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of augmented sensory feedback precision on the acquisition and retention of a simulated chiropractic task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
21
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…greater errors in accuracy 25,41 ; therefore, the relatively small MPF used for grade II mobilization may show less error and significant differences may not be apparent. Oscillation frequency values were very small, with a mean difference of 0.27 Hz between students and the expert (TABLE 1); therefore it is less likely that significant differences would have been observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…greater errors in accuracy 25,41 ; therefore, the relatively small MPF used for grade II mobilization may show less error and significant differences may not be apparent. Oscillation frequency values were very small, with a mean difference of 0.27 Hz between students and the expert (TABLE 1); therefore it is less likely that significant differences would have been observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better feedback methods for learning spinal mobilization techniques are necessary. Previous studies have demonstrated that therapists and students can learn to be more accurate and consistent in applying manual forces when provided with objective feedback on force application to cervical, 50 thoracic, 15,17,41 lumbar, 29,32,54 and peripheral joints. However, the optimal feedback variables for effective learning remain unclear.…”
Section: T T Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless the clinical relevance should be discussed. Scaringe et al [19] analysierten den unterschiedlichen Effekt von quantitativem (verbal und visuell) und qualitativem Feedback anhand zweier Studentengruppen, die in der ersten Phase eine BWS-Manipulation mit zwei unterschiedlichen Kraftniveaus auf ein piezoelektrisches Messsystem applizierten. Innerhalb der anschließenden zweiten Phase wurden die Studenten in sechs weitere Gruppen unterteilt um herauszufinden, inwieweit ein Lerneffekt durch das Geben von Feedbacks 1 bis 8 Tage danach anhält.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Alle anderen 11 Arbeiten evaluierten die Wirksamkeit von Feedback mittels eines objektiven, quantitativen Messinstruments. Innerhalb der Schulungen wurden Techniken der Wirbelsäule trainiert, wobei sich die Studien, bis auf die Arbeit von Chang et al [2], mehrheitlich mit Manipulationstechniken befassten [4,7,10,19,18,23,24,25,28,33,34]. Der Grund dafür könnte sein, dass insbesondere Manipulationstechniken an der Wirbelsäule als anspruchsvoll und sensibel gelten.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation