2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of angiotensin II on the coupled microstructural and biomechanical response of C57BL/6 mouse aorta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the model fit, we calculated R 2 using a nonlinear formulation and further verified the fit by calculating an adjusted R 2 since a larger number of model parameters often gives a better fit (Zeinali-Davarani et al, 2009). The phenomenological model identified strain-induced stiffening evident by an average Ritalicadj2=0.89, which is the same or higher than the non-adjusted R 2 values calculated for the same exponential model in other studies (Fung et al, 1979; Haskett et al, 2012). For control and CTEPH tissues, we found that the model fit the circumferential direction better than the axial direction (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantify the model fit, we calculated R 2 using a nonlinear formulation and further verified the fit by calculating an adjusted R 2 since a larger number of model parameters often gives a better fit (Zeinali-Davarani et al, 2009). The phenomenological model identified strain-induced stiffening evident by an average Ritalicadj2=0.89, which is the same or higher than the non-adjusted R 2 values calculated for the same exponential model in other studies (Fung et al, 1979; Haskett et al, 2012). For control and CTEPH tissues, we found that the model fit the circumferential direction better than the axial direction (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We investigated the ability of a phenomenological exponential Fung-type strain energy function (W) (Fung et al, 1979; Hansen et al, 2009; Haskett et al, 2012; Keyes et al, 2011) to differentiate between strain-and remodeling-induced PA stiffening: W=c2(eQ-1) Q=a1Eθ2+a2Ez2+2a12EθEz where the stress parameter (c) is associated with the slope of the mechanical response, and the material parameters (a 1 , a 2 , and a 12 ) govern the shape of the stress response. Data from circumferential and axial strips from the same tissue were simultaneously fit to the model as previously demonstrated with uniaxial data (Holzapfel, 2006; Kao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3)) could be replaced with a recruitment model (e.g., Ref. [70]), which would provide an alternative mechanism to capture the nonlinear behavior associated with fiber waviness [71] and might provide a better fit of the experimental data. All of these modifications are possible and could be implemented as additional data emerge about the arrangement and properties of the components of the arterial wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous studies in our lab 12 and other others such as Collins et al 11 and Fujikura et al 18 have used wild-type C57BL/6 mice to look into the mechanical properties of the mouse aorta to gain a more complete picture of underlying properties of vessel response, these studies did not include specimens from the actual ApoE AngII infused aneurysm model. And although Collins et al reported some histology, absent in both their work and that of Fujikura et al is analysis of fiber microstructure simultaneously with biomechanical response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also of importance, is the need to couple any biomechanical modeling with changes in extracellular matrix and associated alterations in microstructure. Recent work has started to address this by first defining the mechanical properties and constitutive modeling of wild-type (C57BL/6) mice 11 , 12 . However, these studies do not include the actual the ApoE −/− AngII infused model of AAA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%