1976
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1976.10884954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of an Instructional Test-Taking Unit on Achievement Test Scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A literature review reveals that preparation programs for the SAT have been especially scrutinized for efficacy. Several professionals believe that test-taking skills provide effective strategies which students can use to demonstrate their academic strengths (e.g., Eakins, Green, & Bushnell, 1976;Ford, 1973;Fuyeo, 1977;Gross, 1977;Kreit, 1968;Ortar, 1960;Sarnacki, 1979;Scruggs & Mastropieri, 1992;Slakter, Koehler, & Hampton, 1970;Stevenson, 1976). The improvement a student shows after test preparation training depends on many factors; the student's attitude (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 1991), the length and intensity of the training (Scruggs & Tolfa, 1985), the student's prior knowledge (Bangert-Drowns, Kulik, & Kulik, 1983), and the extent to which test-taking skills are already being used (Manalo, 1996).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review reveals that preparation programs for the SAT have been especially scrutinized for efficacy. Several professionals believe that test-taking skills provide effective strategies which students can use to demonstrate their academic strengths (e.g., Eakins, Green, & Bushnell, 1976;Ford, 1973;Fuyeo, 1977;Gross, 1977;Kreit, 1968;Ortar, 1960;Sarnacki, 1979;Scruggs & Mastropieri, 1992;Slakter, Koehler, & Hampton, 1970;Stevenson, 1976). The improvement a student shows after test preparation training depends on many factors; the student's attitude (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 1991), the length and intensity of the training (Scruggs & Tolfa, 1985), the student's prior knowledge (Bangert-Drowns, Kulik, & Kulik, 1983), and the extent to which test-taking skills are already being used (Manalo, 1996).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%