1994
DOI: 10.1080/10934529409376041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of an anionic and a non‐ionic surfactant on growth and nitrogen fixing ability of a cyanobacterium,Gloeocapsa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of measurable toxicity displayed by SDS over the concentration range studied implies limited interactions with cell membranes and/or intracellular, bioactive macromolecules of U. lactuca. SDS is not particularly toxic towards algae and invertebrates at environmentally realistic concentrations (Tozumcalgan and Atayguneyman 1994;Guilhermino et al 2000;Sandbacka et al 2000). Moreover in some laboratory studies, this and other anionic amphiphiles have been shown to promote algal growth by serving as a direct source of carbon or, through moderate permeation effects, allowing a greater influx of nutrients or an efflux of carbon-rich, nutritionally viable lysis products (Lewis 1990;Dirilgen and Ince 1995).…”
Section: Relative Toxicities Of the Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lack of measurable toxicity displayed by SDS over the concentration range studied implies limited interactions with cell membranes and/or intracellular, bioactive macromolecules of U. lactuca. SDS is not particularly toxic towards algae and invertebrates at environmentally realistic concentrations (Tozumcalgan and Atayguneyman 1994;Guilhermino et al 2000;Sandbacka et al 2000). Moreover in some laboratory studies, this and other anionic amphiphiles have been shown to promote algal growth by serving as a direct source of carbon or, through moderate permeation effects, allowing a greater influx of nutrients or an efflux of carbon-rich, nutritionally viable lysis products (Lewis 1990;Dirilgen and Ince 1995).…”
Section: Relative Toxicities Of the Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a study of anionic sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) toxicity to various taxa including different species of algae, crustaceans, echinoderms, and fi sh, the bacterium Vibrio fi scheri proved to be the most sensitive (41). Tozum-Calgan and Atay-Guneyman (42) reported that both growth and nitrogen fi xation of the cyanobacterium Gloeocapsa were inhibited in the presence of SDS. Sewage sludge isolates Acinetobacter johnsonii and Oligotropha carboxidovorans showed 50 % and 20 % viability during treatment with 0.2 mg L -1 and 2 mg L -1 of SDS, respectively (43).…”
Section: Toxicity To Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study are in agreement with other results obtained from various studies on the toxicity of anionic surfactants. Both growth and nitrogen fixation of the cyanobacterium Gloeocapsa were inhibited at 50 ppm of SDS, corresponding to 1.73 × 10 −4 mol L −1 [16]. In another study consisting of various taxa, the EC 50 value obtained for the bacterium Vibrio fischeri was 2.6 mg L −1 of SDS, corresponding to 9.02 × 10 −6 mol L −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The V. fischeri proved to be the most sensitive organism in the study evaluating different species of bacteria, algae, crustaceans, echinoderms and fish [3]. Higher organisms also showed sensitivity to the surfactants, with symptoms including acute toxicity (microorganisms) [3,16], behavioural changes (fish) [17], and skin damage (humans) [18,19]. The sewage sludge isolates A. johnsonii and Oligotropha carboxidovorans [20] showed complete loss of viability during the treatment with 0.07 and 0.7 mg ml .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%