1981
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330550111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of aging and secular trend on adult stature in rural western Ireland

Abstract: Cross-sectional data, consisting of anthropometric measurements for 347 adults males and 261 adult females in western Ireland measured during the 1930s, were used to determine the effects of aging and secular change upon stature. Estimates of statural loss due to aging were obtained using partial regression of stature on age while controlling for subischial length, and regression of the difference between observed stature and maximum predicted stature on age. Males show the effects of aging to a greater extent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible way that the cross-sectional design of this study may systematically distort the current analysis is via the well-described secular trends of increasing height and weight that were documented over the previous century [e.g., Relethford and Lees, 1981]. Our inclusion of TIV as a covariate should account for any exaggeration of age-related brain volume decline associated with an underlying trend of increasing body size in younger subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One possible way that the cross-sectional design of this study may systematically distort the current analysis is via the well-described secular trends of increasing height and weight that were documented over the previous century [e.g., Relethford and Lees, 1981]. Our inclusion of TIV as a covariate should account for any exaggeration of age-related brain volume decline associated with an underlying trend of increasing body size in younger subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This effect begins in the mid-40s, thereafter followed by a relatively rapid decrease in measured height (Galloway et al, 1990). However, the amount of height loss is not exclusively a result of the aging process itself, but also a function of birth cohort (Relethford and Lees, 1981;Rossman, 1986). The relative importance of birth cohort effects and actual age-related declines in height with aging can be assessed, and estimates vary between 40-60% in terms of secular change (Cline et al, 1989).…”
Section: Age-related Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Estimates of age-associated stature loss vary among populations and with age range considered (Miall et al, 1967;Hertzog et al, 1969;Himes and Mueller, 1977;Panek, 1978;Relethford and Lees, 1981;Chumlea et al, 1988). For example, estimated declines in height with age were 0.05 cm per year in middle class American White adults of both sexes between 65 and 89 years (Chumlea et al, 1988) and 0.11 cm per year in rural Polish adults of both sexes between 35 and 76 years (Panek, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%