1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90310-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of age and full palatal coverage on oral stereognostic ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that the younger group had higher test scores than the older group, except for comparisons between the 20s and 30s age groups. This result is consistent with previous studies (17)(18)(19)(20). The older the subjects, the more frequently they misidentified test pieces in other groups rather than in the same group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our results showed that the younger group had higher test scores than the older group, except for comparisons between the 20s and 30s age groups. This result is consistent with previous studies (17)(18)(19)(20). The older the subjects, the more frequently they misidentified test pieces in other groups rather than in the same group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The information obtained must be associated with oral sensory memories derived from visual and tactile experiences [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The person was allowed to move the test-form around in the mouth without any limitations in order to feel it and identify it. The subject was to indicate the identification by pointing out at the appropriate plaster replica [2].…”
Section: Cylindrical •mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the effects of palatal coverage were assessed (14) in dentate and edentulous subjects (with and without dentures), palatal coverage per se did not intelfere with recognition of fOlms (although older subjects identified fewer forms than the younger ones). Oral perception levels were similar either in dentate or edentulous subjects without relationship between oral stereognosis and masticatory ability (15) although dentate individuals had cOITectly identified test forms more often and in a shol1er time when compared with individuals who had no natural teeth (16).…”
Section: Dentate Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%