2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of aerofoil profile modification on a vertical axis wind turbine performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tangential force and the normal force for the blade are F T and F N , respectively. According to the pressure of each tap, F T and F N can be expressed as: According to Equation (9), the tangential force F T can be calculated. And then, the torque of the single blade can be calculated from Equation (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tangential force and the normal force for the blade are F T and F N , respectively. According to the pressure of each tap, F T and F N can be expressed as: According to Equation (9), the tangential force F T can be calculated. And then, the torque of the single blade can be calculated from Equation (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the large-type HAWT is very popular, but it is mainly installed in mountains, grasslands and oceans, where the infrastructure costs are very high. Moreover, there is an inevitable transmission loss of power because the wind turbines are far away from the power demand centers [8][9][10]. Straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines (Sb-VAWTs) have been favored by global researchers due to their low production cost and insensitivity to high turbulence intensity in cities [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be implemented together with a plasma actuator at the airfoil leading edge [35], or the plasma actuator can be implemented at the Gurney flap [81]. In addition to these, Gurney flaps have been used together with dimples [82], or with a trailing edge flap [83]. The most recent review of the Gurney flap was published by Wang et al [80].…”
Section: Gurney Flaps (Classification: Passive Geometric)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better lift augmentation at higher Re [82] 2015 Gurney flap 2%c 255,000; 360,000 35-40% increase in tangential force [84] 2015 Gurney flap Axial pump 0.7-1.4%c 690,000 25% increase in pump head, widened operating range, decreased efficiency [59] 2014 Microtab Wind turbine 0.5-1.2%c 1,000,000 Increased lift and drag [88] 2014 Gurney flap 2%c 1,000,000 Lift augmentation, vibration control [86] 2013 Gurney flap 1.04-2.38%c 1,000,000 Effect on max. lift coefficient depends on airfoil shape [89] 2012 Gurney flap Centrifugal fan 15.9%b 2 30,000-82,000 Pressure ratio and operating range improved at Re < 69,000 [81] 2012 Gurney flap 3-7%c 20,000-35,000 Lift augmentation [90] 2011 Gurney flap Axial fan 10, 20, 30%c < 100,000 Max 18% increase in efficiency with q v,max [83] 2011 Gurney flap 0.7-6%c 254,000 Lift and drag augmentation [91] 2011 Gurney flap 1-6%c 105,000 Wake vortex control [92] 2011 Gurney flap 1.5%c 2,100,000 Vibration reduction [93] 2010 Jet-flap LPT cascade 25,000-200,000 12.5% reduction in solidity [94] 2010 Gurney flap LPT cascade 0.5-3%c 25,000-200,000 12.5% reduction in solidity [8] 2010 Microtab Wind turbine 1-1.5%c 460,000 Max 37% increase in lift [35] 2010 Gurney flap 3000-20,000 Lift augmentation [95] 2010 Gurney flap 40,000-80,000 Lift augmentation [96] 2003 Gurney flap Turbine cascade 0.6-2.7%c 28,000-167,000 Max 9% increase in lift force [85] 2000 Gurney flap 0.5-2%c 1,000,000 Increased lift and drag Outcome: Lift augmentation…”
Section: Gurney Flaps (Classification: Passive Geometric)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation