The Effects of Accelerated Revenue Recognition on Earnings Management and Earnings Informativeness: Evidence from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101

Abstract

The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101 to address its concern that firms were masking true performance by managing earnings using accelerated revenue recognition. Critics of this Accounting Bulletin stated that it would eliminate industry-accepted revenue recognition practices and reduce the quality of reported earnings. The FASB's revenue recognition discussions echo these concerns stating that revenues recorded prior to the completion of the earnings process contain value-relevant information about future performance. This paper investigates these two hypotheses using a sample of firms that accelerated revenue recognition prior to SAB No. 101 adoption (SAB 101 firms) and a matched set of firms that were unaffected by this regulation (unaffected firms). Our earnings distribution tests indicate that SAB 101 firms are more likely to meet earnings benchmarks. Specifically, we find that, in the pre-adoption period, SAB 101 firms report fewer small negative and more small positive earnings than they do in the post-adoption period and than do unaffected firms in the pre-adoption period; SAB 101 firms report fewer small negative and more small positive earnings changes in the pre-adoption period compared to the post-adoption period. We also document that SAB 101 firms are more likely to have weaker corporate governance and more likely to have financial covenants, providing them with greater incentives to manage earnings. However, we find that the association between earnings and future cash flows and between unexpected earnings and earnings announcement period returns were higher for SAB 101 firms than for unaffected firms in the preadoption period, indicating higher earnings informativeness for SAB 101 firms. These associations declined for SAB 101 firms in the post-adoption period, suggesting that SAB No. 101 caused a decline in earnings informativeness. Overall, our results suggest that, although the revenue recognition practices targeted by SAB No. 101 have been used by some firms to manage earnings, the regulation's prohibition of revenue recognition prior to completion of the earnings process, on average, results in less informative earnings since these unearned revenues provide value-relevant information.

The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting

“…He finds that firms with debt in their capital structure are more likely to engage in "real activities management" to meet thresholds than firms that have no debt. Altamuro, Beatty, and Weber (2005) investigate the effect of having bank debt on firms' revenue recognition decisions. They find that firms with bank debt are more likely to accelerate revenue recognition than firms that have no bank debt in their capital structure.…”

Changes in the measurement of fair value: Implications for accounting earnings

“…Following prior research (eg., Altamuro et al 2005;Dechow et al 2010a), we use the earnings response coefficient (ERC) as an indicator of earnings informativeness. The assumption is that if managerial discretion in fair value distorts the informativeness of earnings then the equity return for a given level of unexpected earnings should be lower.…”

The Impact of the IAS/IFRS Adoption on the Predictive Quality of Discretionary Accruals: A Comparison between the French and the British Context

“…Thus, offering some accruals elements which are the best for predicting future cash flow for the enterprise. Such perspective is widely illustrated by the accounting literature (Holthausen & Leftwich, 1983;Watts & Zimmerman, 1990;Subramanyam, 1996;Demski, 1998;Degeorge et al, 1999;Arya et al, 2003;Kanagaretnam et al, 2004;Altamuro et al, 2005;Louis & Robinson, 2005;Badertsher et al, 2012), who consider that according to this point of view. the managers make use of the elasticity that exists in the accounting principles generally admitted to ameliorate the pertinence and the feasibility of the published accounting information; and consequently increases the predictive usefulness and faithful representation.…”