2015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1559685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of a Transition to Minimalist Shoe Running on Intrinsic Foot Muscle Size

Abstract: A proposed benefit of minimalist shoe running is an increase in intrinsic foot muscle strength. This study examined change in intrinsic foot muscle size in runners transitioning to Vibram FiveFingers™ minimalist shoes compared to a control group running in traditional running shoes. We compare pre-transition size between runners who developed bone marrow edema to those who did not. 37 runners were randomly assigned to the Vibram FiveFingers™ group (n=18) or control group (n=19). Runners' bone marrow edema and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies did show promising results in hypertrophy of abductor halluces (Johnson et al 2015), flexor digitorum brevis muscles, abductor digiti minimi and significantly increased longitudinal arch stiffness (Miller et al, 2014). It should be acknowledged that Johnson et al, 2015 documented that pre IFM strength was also a factor in a safe transition to minimal running shoes, with some participants (primarily woman with smaller IFM) developing bone marrow oedema in response to the intervention. Knapik et al, (2016) recently reported that despite impact forces generally being lower in minimally shod shoes that the findings were inconclusive in regard to impact forces, loading and injury rates.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The studies did show promising results in hypertrophy of abductor halluces (Johnson et al 2015), flexor digitorum brevis muscles, abductor digiti minimi and significantly increased longitudinal arch stiffness (Miller et al, 2014). It should be acknowledged that Johnson et al, 2015 documented that pre IFM strength was also a factor in a safe transition to minimal running shoes, with some participants (primarily woman with smaller IFM) developing bone marrow oedema in response to the intervention. Knapik et al, (2016) recently reported that despite impact forces generally being lower in minimally shod shoes that the findings were inconclusive in regard to impact forces, loading and injury rates.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The studies included four randomised control trials (RCTs) (Lynn et al, 2012;Miller et al, 2014;Rathleff et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2015) and three pre/post-test designs (Hashimoto et al, 2014;Mulligan et al, 2013;Skou et al, 2012).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations