2001
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2001.6700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of a Stellar Encounter on a Planetesimal Disk

Abstract: We investigate the effects of a passing stellar encounter on a planetesimal disk through analytical calculations and numerical simulations, and derive the boundary radius ($a_{\rm planet}$) outside which planet formation is inhibited by disruptive collisions with high relative velocities.Comment: 25 pages, 11 figures, included in 15 tex-files, 7 ps-files and 4 eps-file

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
132
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the ensemble of N-body simulations described above, we can find the distributions of close encounters. These distributions, in conjunction with the cross sections for disruptions of planetary systems (see x 4; Adams & Laughlin 2001), binary-disk systems (Ostriker 1994;Heller 1993Heller , 1995Kobayashi & Ida 2001), and binary-star interactions (Heggie et al 1996;Rasio et al 1995), can then be used to estimate the probability of interactions as a function of system size N (and other initial conditions).…”
Section: Distribution Of Closest Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the ensemble of N-body simulations described above, we can find the distributions of close encounters. These distributions, in conjunction with the cross sections for disruptions of planetary systems (see x 4; Adams & Laughlin 2001), binary-disk systems (Ostriker 1994;Heller 1993Heller , 1995Kobayashi & Ida 2001), and binary-star interactions (Heggie et al 1996;Rasio et al 1995), can then be used to estimate the probability of interactions as a function of system size N (and other initial conditions).…”
Section: Distribution Of Closest Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the disc size is an important parameter because it defines the physical extent of the potentially forming planetary system. The disc size after an encounter event was investigated for example by Kobayashi & Ida (2001). They found that the disc size after an equal-mass encounter is one-third of the periastron distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they suggested to convert the formula for disc-mass loss for parabolic, coplanar encounters reported by Olczak et al (2006) directly into an upper limit for disc truncation, assuming a mass-density distribution within the disc of Σ = r −1 . The few previous studies that considered disc sizes in stellar cluster environments (Adams et al 2006;Malmberg et al 2011;Pfalzner 2013) generalised, for lack of a universal description of disc sizes, the results obtained for equal-mass encounter by Kobayashi & Ida (2001) to non-equal mass encounters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stellar flybys have been invoked to explain the high eccentricity orbits of some Kuiper belt objects such as Sedna (Kenyon & Bromley 2004), the dynamics of planetary systems (Malmberg et al 2007;Spurzem et al 2009), and the structures of debris disks (Larwood 1997;Mouillet et al 1997;Kalas et al 2000;Kobayashi & Ida 2001). Impacts of stellar flybys during A&A 532, A120 (2011) the first few million years have also been studied in the context of the evolution of protoplanetary disks and planet formation (Bonnell et al 2001;Olczack et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%