1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(199805)185:1<4::aid-path50>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of a myocardial bridge on coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
107
1
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
107
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[19][20][21] It is not clear how much the underlying atherosclerotic plaques contribute to in-stent restenosis, but both the deep injury and the vessel stretch were shown to trigger the development of in-stent neointima in even normal coronary arteries. 22) Although maximum deployment pressures were not different between the two groups, an additional external force on the vessel wall might have caused a deeper injury in the MB group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] It is not clear how much the underlying atherosclerotic plaques contribute to in-stent restenosis, but both the deep injury and the vessel stretch were shown to trigger the development of in-stent neointima in even normal coronary arteries. 22) Although maximum deployment pressures were not different between the two groups, an additional external force on the vessel wall might have caused a deeper injury in the MB group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These adverse effects likely result from 2 distinct mechanisms: (1) accelerated plaque formation in the segment proximal to the MB, as investigated in the current study, and (2) alteration in the effective blood perfusion of the affected myocardial territory owing to delayed arterial relaxation in diastole or the Venturi effect on the septal branches that can cause functional ischemia of the septal wall 4. Furthermore, external systolic compression and endothelial dysfunction frequently observed in the tunneled artery could stimulate coronary vasospasm and platelet aggregation resulting in acute coronary syndrome in certain clinical settings 16, 21, 23, 24…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…MB is a common anatomic anomaly identified by coronary CTA in routine practice and is seen in as many as 40-80% of cases on autopsy [2,3]. Although MB is generally considered a benign anomaly, it may be associated with clinical manifestations that have been linked to dynamic compression [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%