1995
DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00026-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation

Abstract: The effects of a mobile telephone task on young and elderly drivers choice reaction time, headway, lateral position, and workload were studied when the subjects were driving in a car-following situation, in the VTI driving simulator. It was found that a mobile telephone task had a negative effect upon the drivers choice reaction time, and that the effect was more pronounced for the elderly drivers. Furthermore, the subjects did not compensate for their increased reaction time by increasing their headway during… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
212
7
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
13
212
7
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indeed showed that auditory distractions generate a faster response than the non-distracted condition (auditory distraction vs. no distraction: t(138) ¼ À2.08, p < 0.05, mean difference À0.328 seconds (95% CI À0.640, À0.017); visual distraction vs. no distraction: t(138) ¼ À0.23, p > 0.05, À0.232 seconds (CI À0.545, 0.082)). However, these results conflict with welldocumented results that show that distractions degrade driving performance (Brown et al 1969, Alm and Nilsson 1995, Cooper and Zheng 2002, Lam 2002.…”
Section: Driving Simulator Studiescontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The results indeed showed that auditory distractions generate a faster response than the non-distracted condition (auditory distraction vs. no distraction: t(138) ¼ À2.08, p < 0.05, mean difference À0.328 seconds (95% CI À0.640, À0.017); visual distraction vs. no distraction: t(138) ¼ À0.23, p > 0.05, À0.232 seconds (CI À0.545, 0.082)). However, these results conflict with welldocumented results that show that distractions degrade driving performance (Brown et al 1969, Alm and Nilsson 1995, Cooper and Zheng 2002, Lam 2002.…”
Section: Driving Simulator Studiescontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Although the safety risk of using mobile devices while driving is well documented (Alm and Nilsson, 1995;Young et al, 2007;Treffner and Barrett, 2004;Horberry et al, 2006). Innovative applications targeting In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems (IVIS) are likely to place an increasingly high workload on the driver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another fear is that of narrowing of attention. Alm and Nilsson (1995) warned that high task demands may lead to narrowing of attention, which is unwanted in situations that ask for a more global type of attention, for example, near intersections. However, results from Crundall et al (1999) show that attention is actually directed at hazardous events when they present themselves, away from extra-foveal regions of the visual ®eld.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%