1991
DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90064-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of a health education intervention program among Cretan adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
57
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data entered in RevMan included the following: pre/post-changes in outcome measures for the intervention and the control groups, the corresponding number of participants for each treatment group in the trial and standard deviation (s). Where studies 38,39,51,55,56 reported mean changes in outcome measures from baseline (pre) to end point (post) for each intervention group (that is, DI or DC), data were entered in RevMan with their corresponding number of participants and s's. For trials 40,41,43,44,46 that reported both pre-and post-intervention values, changes were computed by subtracting the pre-from the post-measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Data entered in RevMan included the following: pre/post-changes in outcome measures for the intervention and the control groups, the corresponding number of participants for each treatment group in the trial and standard deviation (s). Where studies 38,39,51,55,56 reported mean changes in outcome measures from baseline (pre) to end point (post) for each intervention group (that is, DI or DC), data were entered in RevMan with their corresponding number of participants and s's. For trials 40,41,43,44,46 that reported both pre-and post-intervention values, changes were computed by subtracting the pre-from the post-measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that intervention components vary considerably across studies, it is not possible to do so definitively; however, several salient considerations emerge from this review. An assessment limited to the findings of formal meta-analysis suggests that the following commonly used program components may be valuable: parent involvement (as discussed above), [37][38][39][40][41]43,44 classroom (or after-school) instruction on improving dietary intake or increasing PA, [37][38][39][40][41]43,44,46,49 participatory/hands-on, skill building student activities, [37][38][39][40][41]43,44,49 the provision of print materials, [37][38][39][40] teacher training for program implementation, 37-39 student competitions, 44 improvements to the nutritional environment (school cafeteria offerings, etc. ), 43,46 implementation of PA programs in addition to routine PE, 40,41,43 modifications to duration, frequency or intensity of existing PE, 46,49 use of non-competitive PA, 49 training in behavioral techniques (including self monitoring, goal setting, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations