1993
DOI: 10.1002/dev.420260806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of 24‐hr maternal separation and of litter‐size reduction on the isolation‐distress response of 12‐day‐old rat pups

Abstract: We asked whether the mother-infant interaction acted over time to regulate the ultrasonic vocalization (USV) and activity responses of 12-day-old rat pups to isolation in a novel test area. In a series of four experiments, we found that 24 hr of maternal deprivation did not alter USV isolation responses, but that reduction of litter size to 4 pups from 8 markedly attenuated the USV response and increased weight gain, without effects on activity level. Ambient temperatures during 24-hr maternal separation were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature also was not a factor. While chilled pups are licked and groomed more frequently than their control pups (Stern & Johnson, 1990), and chilled pups may vocalize at a higher rate than warm pups depending on their prior isolation history (Blumberg, Sokoloff, Kirby, & Kent, 2000;Hofer et al, 1993), our observed differences in vocalization and maternal behavior were not due to any difference in pups' core temperatures since there were no differences in this measure. Finally, body weight was not a factor in differential call rates because while the Acute Isolates emitted as few calls as the Chronic Isolates compared to Home Nest pups, their body weight was the same as the Home Nest pups and significantly greater than that of the Chronic Isolates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Temperature also was not a factor. While chilled pups are licked and groomed more frequently than their control pups (Stern & Johnson, 1990), and chilled pups may vocalize at a higher rate than warm pups depending on their prior isolation history (Blumberg, Sokoloff, Kirby, & Kent, 2000;Hofer et al, 1993), our observed differences in vocalization and maternal behavior were not due to any difference in pups' core temperatures since there were no differences in this measure. Finally, body weight was not a factor in differential call rates because while the Acute Isolates emitted as few calls as the Chronic Isolates compared to Home Nest pups, their body weight was the same as the Home Nest pups and significantly greater than that of the Chronic Isolates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In contrast, these results conflict with two studies from Hofer's laboratory with different isolation protocols. Twenty-four hours of maternal deprivation in 12-day-old pups did not affect the number of USVs compared to pups from control litters of a comparable size (Hofer, Brunelli, & Shair, 1993). In addition, pups reared in complete isolation from the day of birth (pup-in-the-cup procedure) showed a higher rate of USVs than controls when tested in a novel environment (Hofer et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Spearman rank order correlations also were performed and gave similar results. These low correlations for USV are not simply the result of a natural inconsistency in USV response levels from 1 day to the next: We analyzed data from a previous study (Hofer, Brunelli, & Shair, 1993) and found r .70 ( p .02) when control pups FIGURE 2 The development of USV responses to isolation observed in the three lines. The mean number of USV emitted during a 2-min isolation test is represented by the symbols given in the ®gure for pups in each line at each age.…”
Section: Time Course Of Development Of the Usv Response To Isolationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, in the natural context, variations in maternal care might be of major importance. This is indicated by studies on the effects of handling (Bell et al 1971), maternal separation (D'Amato andCabib 1987;Zimmerberg et al 2003a, b), and litter size (Hofer et al 1993), and adoptions (Darnaudery et al 2004) on ultrasonic calling in infant rodents. Darnaudery et al (2004) found that pups raised by fostering dams showed less isolation-induced calling when compared to pups raised by their actual mothers, a finding which is similar to the present observation of lowered calling behavior in prenatal cross-fostered pups.…”
Section: Within-strain Embryo-transfer: Comparison Between B6jola Andmentioning
confidence: 99%