2006
DOI: 10.2980/1195-6860(2006)13[531:teoyoh]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of 20 years of highway presence on the genetic structure of Rana dalmatina populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hitchings and Beebee [65] showed lower genetic diversity and twice the differentiation among urban common frog (Rana temporaria) populations compared to populations from rural habitat, despite study sites in the urban setting being in greater proximity. Lesbarrères et al [66] documented profound genetic structuring and significantly lower genetic variation in sub-populations of agile frog (Rana dalmatina) sampled on either side of a highway, compared to populations sampled far from trafficked roads. Large roads have also been identified as effective barriers for common frog (Rana temporaria) dispersal [67] and, similarly, Vos et al [68] showed that roads and railways worked as barriers to gene flow and represented a higher explanatory value to the genetic differentiation between populations of moor frog (Rana arvalis) than geographic distance between populations.…”
Section: Habitat Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitchings and Beebee [65] showed lower genetic diversity and twice the differentiation among urban common frog (Rana temporaria) populations compared to populations from rural habitat, despite study sites in the urban setting being in greater proximity. Lesbarrères et al [66] documented profound genetic structuring and significantly lower genetic variation in sub-populations of agile frog (Rana dalmatina) sampled on either side of a highway, compared to populations sampled far from trafficked roads. Large roads have also been identified as effective barriers for common frog (Rana temporaria) dispersal [67] and, similarly, Vos et al [68] showed that roads and railways worked as barriers to gene flow and represented a higher explanatory value to the genetic differentiation between populations of moor frog (Rana arvalis) than geographic distance between populations.…”
Section: Habitat Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability for different European amphibian species of getting killed crossing a road with medium traffic load range from 34 to 61% [70]. Genetic studies on the depleting effects of urbanization and road density on ranid frogs [9,71], or general habitat fragmentation on tree frog populations [8] are examples for developments that might arrive at crested newt populations in Salzburg and Bavaria in the near future.…”
Section: Spatial Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence natural landscapes are fragmented and isolation of local populations in discrete habitat patches increases, while the surrounding areas are unfavourable and dispersal is limited. This issue has become of high importance for conservation biology at large [5,6] and for amphibian conservation in particular [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roads may affect wildlife populations through barrier effects, leading to reduction of local genetic diversity and isolating populations (Balkenhol and Waits, 2009;Lesbarrères et al, 2006). Wildlife crossings are one of the measures used to mitigate barrier effects and reduce wildlife road-kill, improving connectivity between habitats fragmented by roads (Beckmann et al, 2010;Corlatti et al, 2009;Lesbarrères and Fahrig, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%