1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00803.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of 0.025% hyoscine hydrobromide eyedrops on visual function in man

Abstract: Instillation of three drops of 0.025% hyoscine hydrobromide into one eye at 5 min intervals caused a mydriasis and cycloplegia of rapid onset and of 4-6 days' duration; this was similar to the previously reported actions of concentrations of up to 0.5%. After refraction for the working distance of the experiments, contrast sensitivity to stationary oscilloscope-generated grating patterns of 10 and 20 c/deg was unaffected despite the mydriasis. Also, contrast sensitivity to laser interference fringes of 10 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average observed (with SD error bars) and predicted (two-compartment model) scopolamine plasma concentrations The very long duration of pupil dilation, in line with the prolonged cycloplegic effects of anticholinergic ocular mydriatics [49], could possibly be explained by an element of retention of the drug in the anterior chamber of the eye and/or a high sensitivity of the iris to cholinergic inhibition. This could not be examined any further, because the effect lasted much longer than the observation period of this study, which refuted PK-PD analyses.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average observed (with SD error bars) and predicted (two-compartment model) scopolamine plasma concentrations The very long duration of pupil dilation, in line with the prolonged cycloplegic effects of anticholinergic ocular mydriatics [49], could possibly be explained by an element of retention of the drug in the anterior chamber of the eye and/or a high sensitivity of the iris to cholinergic inhibition. This could not be examined any further, because the effect lasted much longer than the observation period of this study, which refuted PK-PD analyses.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%