The effectiveness of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial

Göksoy, Beslen; Kiyak, Mevlut

doi:10.1080/00365521.2021.1941238

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Pain is the most significant contributor to discomfort. In one clinical study, binders were found to greatly minimize the requirement for analgesics during surgery as well as post-operative discomfort, 10 but there are still insufficient data to conclude that ACDs are effective in increasing patient comfort.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims: Colonoscopy for screening is associated with unpleasant experiences for patients, and abdominal compression devices have been developed to minimize these problems. However, there is a paucity of data supporting the therapeutic benefits of this strategy. This study examined the effects of using an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on the cecal intubation time (CIT), abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural changes.Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus (from inception to November 2021) for randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on CIT, abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural change. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.Results: Our pooled analysis of seven randomized controlled trials revealed that abdominal compression devices significantly reduced CIT (WMD, –0.76 [–1.49 to –0.03] minutes; p=0.04), abdominal compression (OR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.94; p=0.03), and postural changes (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27–0.78; p=0.004) during colonoscopy. However, our results did not show a significant change in patient comfort (WMD, –0.48; 95% CI, –1.05 to 0.08; p=0.09) when using an abdominal compression device.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that employing an abdominal compression device may reduce CIT, abdominal compression, and postural change but have no impact on patient comfort.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the efficacy of encircling an ACD during colonoscopies. 5,[10][11][12][13][14] Studies have shown that ACD is effective in shortening the time required for cecal intubation during surgery. 11,14 However, investigators have concluded that there are discrepancies in their findings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…10 Unfortunately, these measures are applied variably, need assisting persons, and are not always successful. [11][12][13] The current study was planned to evaluate the role of applying abdominal pressure using abdominal belt with respect to overall improvement in the practice of colonoscopy. colonoscopy were noted.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value of abdominal pressure by using abdominal belt in facilitating colonoscopic procedure in Egyptian patients

Aya Mohamed Mahros,

Eslam Mohamed El Shenawy,

MohammedHussien Ahmed

2023

J Pak Med Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the role of applying abdominal pressure using abdominal belt in overall improvement in the practice of colonoscopy.Method: The randomised, single-blind case-control study was conducted from March 2020 to March 2021 at Kafrelsheikh University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, and comprised patients of either gender aged 30-70 years who underwent elective colonoscopy. The patients were randomised into belly belt group A and control group B. The endoscopist was blinded to the group assignment. Time needed to reach the caecum, requirement for changing the position, dosage of anaesthetic agents, completion of endoscopy, ileal intubation, post-procedure pain and abdominal distension were noted and compared between the groups. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.Result: Of the 160 patients, 80(50%) were in each of the two groups. There were 38 (47.5%) males and 43 (52.5%) (females) in group A with mean age 55.8±4.1 years. In group B, there were 40(50%) males and as many females with mean age 55.4±3.4 years. Group A had significantly better overall outcomes than group B (p<0.05) except procedure complications (p=0.526).Conclusion: Abdominal belt was found to be an effective and simple method to improve the practice of colonoscopy.Keywords: Colonoscopy, Ileum, Cecum, Colorectal neoplasms, Intubation, Intratracheal, Anaesthesia.

show abstract

The impact of abdominal compression devices on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abuelazm,

Abdelnabi,

Mahmoud

et al. 2023

Current Medical Research and Opinion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effectiveness of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

Use of abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Use of abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Value of abdominal pressure by using abdominal belt in facilitating colonoscopic procedure in Egyptian patients

The impact of abdominal compression devices on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About