The effectiveness of trauma care systems at different stages of development in reducing mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Traumatic injury remains the leading cause of death, with more than five million deaths every year. Little is known about the comparative effectiveness in reducing mortality of trauma care systems at different stages of development. The objective of this study was to review the literature and examine differences in mortality associated with different stages of trauma system development. Method A systematic review of peer-reviewed population-based studies retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Additional studies were identified from references of articles, through database searching, and author lists. Articles written in English and published between 2000 and 2020 were included. Selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies were performed by two independent reviewers. The results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 52 studies with a combined 1,106,431 traumatic injury patients were included for quantitative analysis. The overall mortality rate was 6.77% (n = 74,930). When patients were treated in a non-trauma centre compared to a trauma centre, the pooled statistical odds of mortality were reduced (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.69–0.79]; p < 0.001). When patients were treated in a non-trauma system compared to a trauma system the odds of mortality rates increased (OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.10–1.24]; p < 0.001). When patients were treated in a post-implementation/initial system compared to a mature system, odds of mortality were significantly higher (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.37–1.55]; p < 0.001). Conclusion The present study highlights that the survival of traumatic injured patients varies according to the stage of trauma system development in which the patient was treated. The analysis indicates a significant reduction in mortality following the introduction of the trauma system which is further enhanced as the system matures. These results provide evidence to support efforts to, firstly, implement trauma systems in countries currently without and, secondly, to enhance existing systems by investing in system development. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO CRD42019142842.

Exploring Factors That Influence Injured Patients’ Outcomes following Road Traffic Crashes: A Multi-Site Feasibility Study

“…This study further supports the potential benefits of establishing and developing a national trauma system in SA [9]. The introduction of national or regional trauma systems in North American [38,39], European [18,40], Asian [41,42], and Oceanian countries [38,43] has resulted in significant reductions in trauma-related mortality [44]. The difference in the mortality rate between KSMC, a developing trauma center, and the other two hospitals further supports this argument.…”

Impact of easing COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on traumatic injuries in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: one-year experience at a major trauma centre

“…The mortality was 5,754 cases in 2019 and 4,618 cases in 2020, which further shows that the burden of road traffic injury was significant even during the country-wide lockdown [ 26 ]. Given that an all-inclusive trauma system plays an essential part in decreasing mortality arising from road injuries [ 27 , 28 ], there are opportunities to extend and strengthen the trauma care system in Saudi Arabia [ 9 ]. Moreover, injury prevention needs a robust community programme and legislation around road safety measures, including strict enforcement that can decrease the burden of traumatic injuries in the country.…”

Surgical stabilization of critical abdominal injuries in a mature rural trauma system: A retrospective study

“…Trauma systems have been found to be effective in decreasing mortality especially as the trauma system matures 9,10,18,19 . Maturation of trauma systems appears to occur approximately 10 years after creation 9,18 .…”