2017
DOI: 10.1097/dcc.0000000000000266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Transitions-of-Care Interventions in Reducing Hospital Readmissions and Mortality

Abstract: The findings of this review support the use of transitions-of-care interventions such as tailored discharge planning and postdischarge phone calls.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Efforts to improve the hospital-SNF transition should attempt to include the patient and family member, consistent with how similar efforts address the hospital-home transition. [11][12][13] Ideally, these efforts to include patients and family members should begin with post-acute setting selection, since research suggests that patients may prioritize aspects of their own care experience over standardized quality measures. 29 Our study indicates that patients and family members would like to be involved in the PAC transition process; indeed, they described not being included as Ba missed setup,^and expressed confusion about their own medications, not knowing about appointments, that they did not know what to ask hospital and SNF staff, and that they Bwould have enjoyed knowing a little bit more.F uture research might directly focus on the development and implications of programs aimed to address PAC continuity issues found by the present research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 Efforts to improve the hospital-SNF transition should attempt to include the patient and family member, consistent with how similar efforts address the hospital-home transition. [11][12][13] Ideally, these efforts to include patients and family members should begin with post-acute setting selection, since research suggests that patients may prioritize aspects of their own care experience over standardized quality measures. 29 Our study indicates that patients and family members would like to be involved in the PAC transition process; indeed, they described not being included as Ba missed setup,^and expressed confusion about their own medications, not knowing about appointments, that they did not know what to ask hospital and SNF staff, and that they Bwould have enjoyed knowing a little bit more.F uture research might directly focus on the development and implications of programs aimed to address PAC continuity issues found by the present research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike efforts to improve transitions from hospitals to SNFs, these interventions often actively include patients and their families. [11][12][13] Such interventions commonly use the Coleman Care Transitions Program, 14 the Transitional Care Model, 15 or ProjectRED (Re-Engineered Discharge), 16 and might include helping patients and caregivers identify their own goals, home visits, or follow-up calls with patients post-discharge, or the use of transition coaches who train patients and their families on PAC skills. The lack of such patient-focused initiatives in the transition from hospital to SNF may be due in part to their complexity: whereas hospital-home initiatives are able to directly engage patients in both the hospital and home, hospital-SNF initiatives would require engaging multiple institutions: hospitals and SNFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, studies included three (range: 1-12) scheduled home visits and two (range: 1-13) scheduled telephone follow-up calls. Kamermeyer 12 Studies utilised multicomponent discharge interventions, including standardised discharge instructions, a post-discharge provider appointment, follow-up phone calls and medication reconciliation.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effectiveness of TCPs in reducing readmission and mortality has so far provided mixed results. Most programs demonstrated an improvement in patient outcomes, but a substantial number showed limited impact or worse outcomes (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). A possible explanation for such inconsistency may be due to different patient subgroups with accompanying risk profiles presenting with varying responses to a standardized TCP intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%