2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of sin food taxes: Evidence from Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A key public health objective is to reduce added sugars intake. While a robust body of evidence supports that SSB taxes are associated with reductions in the demand for SSBs, limited and mixed evidence exists on their impact on changes in demand for other sugary products 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ; hence, the potential role of SSB taxes in reducing overall added sugars intake is less understood. To better understand the extent to which SSB taxes can effectively contribute to the goal of sugar intake reduction, this study drew on UPC-level scanner data from a broad range of store types to provide evidence on the net change in grams of sugar sold after the implementation of the Seattle SBT across the major food and beverage products contributing to added sugars intake in the US diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A key public health objective is to reduce added sugars intake. While a robust body of evidence supports that SSB taxes are associated with reductions in the demand for SSBs, limited and mixed evidence exists on their impact on changes in demand for other sugary products 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ; hence, the potential role of SSB taxes in reducing overall added sugars intake is less understood. To better understand the extent to which SSB taxes can effectively contribute to the goal of sugar intake reduction, this study drew on UPC-level scanner data from a broad range of store types to provide evidence on the net change in grams of sugar sold after the implementation of the Seattle SBT across the major food and beverage products contributing to added sugars intake in the US diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 However, a study of the Mexico tax on SSBs and energy-dense foods using household purchase scanner data found that the reduced calories and sugar from purchases of taxed products in year 1 post tax were offset by increases in calories and sugar from purchases of untaxed food and beverage categories. 21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such taxes have been successful in reducing the intake of sugar sweetened products (24) . In Mexico, for example, the levy has increased the cost of sugar sweetened beverages by 15% with a decline in intake between 4 and 12% (25) . Recent data from the UK suggest that intakes per household have fallen by 10% since the introduction of the sugar levy (6) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Colchero et al (2015) and Grogger (2017) investigate the increase in price using a price database, finding that the price of taxed soft drinks increased by more than the tax: Grogger (2017) found an average 14% increase in taxed products while the price of untaxed products did not significantly change, and Colchero et al (2015) found over-shifting but only for carbonated beverages. Aguilar et al (2021) and Colchero et al (2015) both used panel data to investigate the impact on consumer behaviour: Colchero et al (2015) focused on volumes and found purchases of taxed drinks declined by 6% while non-taxed increased by 4%; and Aguilar et al (2021) considered the reduction in calories induced by the tax, which are estimated to fall by 2.7% (they also document full pass-through of the tax with prices increasing by 9.7%). Arteaga et al (2017) also study the effect on consumer behaviour by using industry data, documenting that the volume of taxed products reduced by 3.8%.…”
Section: Existing Sugar Taxesmentioning
confidence: 99%