2019
DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v75i1.904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of Schroth exercises in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is one of the most common structural spinal deformities in adolescents, becoming apparent around the time of puberty. Schroth scoliosis-specific exercises have demonstrated promising results in reducing the progression of AIS. Objectives The aim of this study was to identify, critically appraise and establish the best available evidence for the effectiveness of Schroth exercises in comparison to non-surgical management to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
1
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(103 reference statements)
4
45
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This review aimed to estimate the effect of SSE on scoliotic deformity improvement. Unlike the previous reviews [33,51,52], besides reporting a reduction in Cobb angle, our review emphasized the true effect in terms of reductions beyond clinical measurement errors. The clinical standard for individual curve regression was reported to be > 5° [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This review aimed to estimate the effect of SSE on scoliotic deformity improvement. Unlike the previous reviews [33,51,52], besides reporting a reduction in Cobb angle, our review emphasized the true effect in terms of reductions beyond clinical measurement errors. The clinical standard for individual curve regression was reported to be > 5° [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Level II evidence (RCT) was considered the best methodology to answer intervention-related questions in a systematic review. However, considering the limited number of RCT in the most up-to-date reviews [33,49,51,52], prospective clinical control trials (CCT: Level III) were also analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Evidence Hierarchy and Methodological Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This review aimed to estimate the effect of SSE on scoliotic deformity improvement. Unlike the previous reviews (33,51,52), besides of reporting a reduction in Cobb angle, our review emphasized the true effect in terms of reductions beyond clinical measurement errors. The clinical standard for individual curve regression was reported to be >5° (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%