The effectiveness of public health interventions against COVID-19: Lessons from the Singapore experience

Abstract

Background In dealing with community spread of COVID-19, two active interventions have been attempted or advocated—containment, and mitigation. Given the extensive impact of COVID-19 globally, there is international interest to learn from best practices that have been shown to work in controlling community spread to inform future outbreaks. This study explores the trajectory of COVID-19 infection in Singapore had the government intervention not focused on containment, but rather on mitigation. In addition, we estimate the actual COVID-19 infection cases in Singapore, given that confirmed cases are publicly available. Methods and findings We developed a COVID-19 infection model, which is a modified SIR model that differentiate between detected (diagnosed) and undetected (undiagnosed) individuals and segments total population into seven health states: susceptible (S), infected asymptomatic undiagnosed (A), infected asymptomatic diagnosed (I), infected symptomatic undiagnosed (U), infected symptomatic diagnosed (E), recovered (R), and dead (D). To account for the infection stages of the asymptomatic and symptomatic infected individuals, the asymptomatic infected individuals were further disaggregated into three infection stages: (a) latent (b) infectious and (c) non-infectious; while the symptomatic infected were disaggregated into two stages: (a) infectious and (b) non-infectious. The simulation result shows that by the end of the current epidemic cycle without considering the possibility of a second wave, under the containment intervention implemented in Singapore, the confirmed number of Singaporeans infected with COVID-19 (diagnosed asymptomatic and symptomatic cases) is projected to be 52,053 (with 95% confidence range of 49,370–54,735) representing 0.87% (0.83%-0.92%) of the total population; while the actual number of Singaporeans infected with COVID-19 (diagnosed and undiagnosed asymptomatic and symptomatic infected cases) is projected to be 86,041 (81,097–90,986), which is 1.65 times the confirmed cases and represents 1.45% (1.36%-1.53%) of the total population. A peak in infected cases is projected to have occurred on around day 125 (27/05/2020) for the confirmed infected cases and around day 115 (17/05/2020) for the actual infected cases. The number of deaths is estimated to be 37 (34–39) among those infected with COVID-19 by the end of the epidemic cycle; consequently, the perceived case fatality rate is projected to be 0.07%, while the actual case fatality rate is estimated to be 0.043%. Importantly, our simulation model results suggest that there about 65% more COVID-19 infection cases in Singapore that have not been captured in the official reported numbers which could be uncovered via a serological study. Compared to the containment intervention, a mitigation intervention would have resulted in early peak infection, and increase both the cumulative confirmed and actual infection cases and deaths. Conclusion Early public health measures in the context of targeted, aggressive containment including swift and effective contact tracing and quarantine, was likely responsible for suppressing the number of COVID-19 infections in Singapore.

Is the Infection of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Associated With the Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients?

“…Unfortunately, we did not have complete data on the vaccination status of patients with COVID-19. In addition, some studies showed that different prevention and control measures might have a different impact on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 (41)(42)(43). The government of Indonesia has also applied public health measures, i.e., mitigation intervention, including compulsory mask-wearing, personal protective equipment, social distancing measures, travel and mass gathering restrictions, quarantine of travelers arriving from overseas, isolation of confirmed cases and close contacts, contact tracing and testing, and school closures.…”

Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South African Local Communities: The VaxScenes Study

“…In addition to the lockdown, the country’s pandemic response included implementing infection prevention and control measures such as frequent handwashing, use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, and cough hygiene [ 3 ]. The government also imposed mandatory use of various preventive non-pharmaceutical interventions in public (including face masks and physical distancing) as well as containment measures (such as case identification, isolation, contact tracing, and quarantine) that have played an important role in decreasing transmission [ 4 , 5 ]. The hope for the return to normalcy has been renewed with the development and approval for emergency use of several vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2 to complement the non-pharmaceutical interventions [ 6 , 7 ].…”

A novel CO2-based demand-controlled ventilation strategy to limit the spread of COVID-19 in the indoor environment

“…However, this parameter is highly uncertain in real-world scenarios: It needs to know the number of infections in population, but large portion of infections are not reported, especially those who are asymptomatic. Researchers, including CDC, have conducted several studies [ 47 , [64] , [65] , [66] ] on the prediction for unreported ratio using epidemiological models, to better reflect the full burden of COVID-19. To adapt the current study to general use, the unreported ratio used to calculate the prevalence rate should be updated according to the latest report from the CDC/the department of health or the latest related studies, which could reflect the current epidemiological scenario more accurately.…”