2013
DOI: 10.9768/0022.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Openness in Advertising for Familiar and Unfamiliar Brands in Different Nationalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although consumers predominately use their smartphones for private communication, they can appreciate persuasive communication, when it is entertaining (Watson et al, 2013). Several authors have shown that the experience of "completing" open ads has a positive effect on brand attitude, compared to processing closed ads (e.g., Ketelaar, Maesen, Linssen, & Van Gisbergen, 2013;Thorbjørnsen, Ketelaar, Riet, & Dahlén, 2015). As favorable attitudes towards the brand relate negatively to perceived intrusiveness (e.g., Lee et al, 2015;Li et al, 2002), we hypothesize that: Hypothesis 1.…”
Section: Openness and Perceived Ad Intrusivenessmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although consumers predominately use their smartphones for private communication, they can appreciate persuasive communication, when it is entertaining (Watson et al, 2013). Several authors have shown that the experience of "completing" open ads has a positive effect on brand attitude, compared to processing closed ads (e.g., Ketelaar, Maesen, Linssen, & Van Gisbergen, 2013;Thorbjørnsen, Ketelaar, Riet, & Dahlén, 2015). As favorable attitudes towards the brand relate negatively to perceived intrusiveness (e.g., Lee et al, 2015;Li et al, 2002), we hypothesize that: Hypothesis 1.…”
Section: Openness and Perceived Ad Intrusivenessmentioning
confidence: 93%